Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
The Kawasaki ER-6f model year 2009 and the Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2008 are both motorcycles produced by Kawasaki. They have similar technical specifications, including a 72 HP engine with 2 cylinders and a 649cc displacement. Both models also have liquid cooling and a 4-stroke engine.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same seat height of 785mm and a fuel tank capacity of 15.5 liters. However, there is a significant difference in dry weight. The ER-6f 2009 weighs 204 kg, while the ER-6n 2008 is lighter at 179 kg. This makes the ER-6n more maneuverable and easier to handle.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
One of the strengths of the ER-6f 2009 is its powerful sound, which adds to the overall experience of riding the motorcycle. It also offers good mobility and is reasonably priced. The visual design of the ER-6f is sophisticated, making it an attractive choice for riders. Additionally, the ER-6f is considered beginner-friendly, providing a safe and enjoyable riding experience.
On the other hand, the ER-6n 2008 has its own strengths. It is known for its lightweight construction, which contributes to its precision and ease of handling. The modern and dynamic appearance of the ER-6n is also a plus point for riders looking for a stylish motorcycle. It is particularly suitable for beginners, as it is easy to use and has reliable ergonomics. The inclusion of ABS further enhances the safety features of the ER-6n.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
However, there are some weaknesses associated with each model. The ER-6f 2009's 72 HP engine may not be powerful enough for some riders, especially those looking for a more thrilling and adrenaline-pumping experience. On the other hand, the ER-6n 2008 may not be comfortable for taller riders, as the seating position in relation to the footrests can be uncomfortable for individuals over 1.80m in height. Additionally, the ER-6n may not be suitable for performing "wheelies," as it lacks the necessary stability and power for such maneuvers.
In conclusion, both the Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The ER-6f offers a powerful sound, mobility, and a visually sophisticated design, making it a good choice for beginners. On the other hand, the ER-6n is lightweight, easy to handle, and has a modern appearance, making it suitable for beginners as well. However, the ER-6f may lack power for some riders, while the ER-6n may not be comfortable for taller individuals and is not suitable for performing certain maneuvers.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 em comparação com Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Quer seja no caminho monótono para o trabalho ou em passeios prolongados, a posição de assento confortável, os dois cilindros em linha silenciosos e de baixa vibração e a agilidade no movimento angular proporcionam prazer de condução em todas as situações.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
A Kawasaki não constrói brinquedos. A ER-6N está a ficar mais séria - e continua a ser amiga dos principiantes.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2008. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 57 days compared to 70 days for the Kawasaki ER-6f. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6f and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6f was published on 25/01/2006 and now has more than 30 200 views. This compares to more than 11 200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 29/06/2005.
