Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Kawasaki Z650 2017
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Kawasaki Z650 2017
The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with a displacement of 649cc and liquid cooling. They also have the same number of cylinders and similar torque values, with the ER-6n producing 64 Nm and the Z650 producing 65.7 Nm. However, there are some differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the ER-6n has a slight advantage with 72 HP compared to the Z650's 68.2 HP. This may result in slightly better acceleration and top speed for the ER-6n. However, the difference in power is not significant and may not be noticeable in everyday riding.
Both bikes have a monoshock rear suspension and a steel frame. However, the Z650 has a tubular frame, which may provide better rigidity and handling compared to the ER-6n's perimeter frame. This could result in improved stability and cornering performance for the Z650.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of braking, both bikes have dual disc front brakes with dual piston calipers and petal technology. However, the ER-6n is noted to have weak brakes, which could be a disadvantage in terms of stopping power and overall safety.
In terms of dimensions, the Z650 has slightly smaller overall dimensions compared to the ER-6n. It has a lower seat height of 790mm compared to the ER-6n's 805mm, which may make it more suitable for shorter riders. However, taller riders may find the Z650 a bit small.
In terms of weight, the Z650 is lighter than the ER-6n. The Z650 has a curb weight of 185kg, compared to the ER-6n's 204kg. This weight reduction could result in improved maneuverability and agility for the Z650.
Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters, with the ER-6n having a slightly larger capacity of 16 liters when equipped with ABS.
Kawasaki Z650 2017
In terms of strengths, the ER-6n is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Z650 is noted for its uniform power delivery, sporty chassis, compact dimensions, and negative display.
In terms of weaknesses, the ER-6n is criticized for its weak brakes, which may affect its overall performance and safety. The Z650 is mentioned to be a bit small for taller riders, which could result in discomfort during long rides.
Overall, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2017 are capable naked bikes with similar technical specifications. The choice between the two would depend on personal preferences and priorities, such as power, handling, size, and braking performance.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 em comparação com Kawasaki Z650 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
O motor é potente e muito divertido, e o ER brilha com um acabamento japonês meticuloso e um preço de combate.
Kawasaki Z650 2017
A Kawasaki Z 650 é a ponta da classe média para os pequenos condutores masculinos e femininos. Com as suas dimensões compactas, provavelmente não se sentirá confortável como um gigante. No entanto, as sensações reconfortantes vêm do motor, que se delicia com uma tração muito suave. Do lado do chassis, foi escolhida uma configuração apertada típica da Kawasaki, que encontra um ótimo compromisso na utilização diária. O ecrã negativo é muito fácil de ler e faz lembrar a sua antecessora, a ER-6n - muito bonito!
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z650
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Kawasaki Z650 2017. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 76 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11 200 views. This compares to more than 25 000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 08/11/2016.
