Triumph Street Twin 2019 vs. BMW R nineT 2018

Triumph Street Twin 2019

BMW R nineT 2018
Visão geral - Triumph Street Twin 2019 vs BMW R nineT 2018
The Triumph Street Twin 2019 and the BMW R nineT 2018 are both naked motorcycles with similar engine configurations and advanced safety features such as ABS. However, there are notable differences between the two models.
In terms of the engine and drivetrain, the Triumph Street Twin 2019 features an inline crankshaft configuration with a power output of 65 HP and a torque of 80 Nm. It has a fuel injection system, liquid cooling, and a displacement of 900cc. On the other hand, the BMW R nineT 2018 has a boxer engine configuration with a higher power output of 110 HP and a torque of 116 Nm. It also has a fuel injection system, but it uses an oil/air cooling system and has a larger displacement of 1170cc. The BMW R nineT offers more power and torque, providing a more exhilarating riding experience.
Both motorcycles have similar suspension setups, with telescopic forks at the front and swingarms at the rear. However, the BMW R nineT features an inverted telescopic fork at the front, which is known for its superior performance and stability during aggressive riding. The Triumph Street Twin, on the other hand, has a conventional telescopic fork. Both models have dual shock absorbers at the rear, with the BMW R nineT featuring a monoshock setup, which offers better adjustability and comfort.
In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have steel frames, but the BMW R nineT has a tubular frame with the engine acting as a load-bearing component. This design provides better rigidity and stability, enhancing the overall handling of the motorcycle.

Triumph Street Twin 2019
In terms of braking, both motorcycles have dual disc brakes at the front, but the BMW R nineT has larger diameter discs (320mm compared to 310mm on the Triumph Street Twin). Both models have four-piston calipers, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power.
In terms of dimensions, the BMW R nineT has a wider front tire (120mm compared to 100mm on the Triumph Street Twin) and a wider rear tire (180mm compared to 150mm on the Triumph Street Twin). The BMW R nineT also has a longer wheelbase (1487mm compared to 1445mm on the Triumph Street Twin), which contributes to its stability at higher speeds.
In terms of seat height, the BMW R nineT has a higher seat height of 803mm compared to 760mm on the Triumph Street Twin. This may affect the comfort and accessibility for shorter riders.

BMW R nineT 2018
The BMW R nineT has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters compared to 12 liters on the Triumph Street Twin. This allows for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Twin 2019 offers a powerful engine, ample torque, a robust chassis, strong brakes, an elegant appearance, modern safety features, and a wide range of accessories. The BMW R nineT 2018, on the other hand, boasts a characterful boxer engine, powerful low-end torque, a comfortable seating position, extensive equipment, a large aftermarket accessories market, and an elegant appearance.
As for weaknesses, the Triumph Street Twin 2019 may be considered too modern for the retro segment, while the BMW R nineT 2018 has concerns regarding the footpeg position during maneuvers, passenger comfort, and a higher price point.
In conclusion, the Triumph Street Twin 2019 and the BMW R nineT 2018 are both impressive naked motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences, riding style, and budget.
Especificações técnicas Triumph Street Twin 2019 em comparação com BMW R nineT 2018
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Triumph Street Twin 2019

Exceto pelo seu aspeto, a Triumph Street Twin não é tão retro como pode parecer à primeira vista. Com o seu motor refrigerado a água, modos de condução, controlo de tração e componentes de chassis desportivos, dá a impressão de ser uma moto naked disfarçada com um design retro. Mas todas estas características, em combinação com o potente binário, tornam-se a sua vantagem, uma vez que não tem de se esconder de motos naked com a mesma potência no salão das motos. O melhor dos dois mundos, por assim dizer.
BMW R nineT 2018

O que mais pode ser dito sobre a BMW R nineT? Desde o seu lançamento em 2014, tem sido um verdadeiro favorito perene na cena da personalização e também na própria BMW. Os seus ingredientes, no entanto, são de alta qualidade e explicam porque é que o resultado é tão coerente. O motor boxer, cheio de carácter, é uma verdadeira alegria sempre que se carrega no acelerador e, graças ao maravilhoso som, nunca se torna aborrecido a longo prazo. Apesar do peso relativamente elevado, a BMW é agradável de conduzir graças ao chassis de alta qualidade e encontra uma mistura equilibrada entre a cruiser e a naked desportiva. O visual é, obviamente, uma questão de gosto, mas os números de vendas sugerem que a BMW deve ter feito algo certo. E mesmo que não goste do visual de série, os acessórios são uma dúzia.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Triumph Street Twin vs BMW R nineT
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Twin 2019 and a BMW R nineT 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R nineT 2018 is about 62% higher. A Triumph Street Twin 2019 experiences a loss of 160 EUR in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 300 EUR for a BMW R nineT 2018. Compared to BMW R nineT 2018 there are less Triumph Street Twin 2019 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 15. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Twin with 96 days compared to 115 days for a BMW R nineT. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Triumph Street Twin and 57 reviews for the BMW R nineT since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Street Twin was published on 11/12/2015 and now has more than 45 200 views. This compares to more than 17 000 views for the first review on BMW R nineT published on 17/10/2013.