KTM 790 Adventure 2019 vs. Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

The KTM 790 Adventure 2019 and the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 are both off-road motorcycles that offer impressive performance and capabilities.

Starting with the KTM 790 Adventure 2019, it features a powerful inline twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 799cc. The engine delivers 95 horsepower and 88 Nm of torque, providing strong acceleration and performance. The bike is equipped with a chain transmission and has a 2-cylinder configuration. The suspension system consists of a telescopic fork with a 43mm diameter in the front and a swingarm with a monoshock in the rear, both provided by WP. This setup allows for a travel of 200mm in both the front and rear suspension, ensuring excellent off-road capabilities. The chassis is made of chromium-molybdenum and has a rake of 64.1 degrees and a trail of 107.8mm, providing stability and maneuverability. The bike is equipped with dual-disc brakes in the front, ensuring reliable stopping power. In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the KTM 790 Adventure 2019 features ABS, riding modes, ride-by-wire, and traction control. The bike has a 21-inch front tire diameter, a 150mm rear tire width, and an 18-inch rear tire diameter. It has a wheelbase of 1509mm, a seat height ranging from 830mm to 850mm, and a dry weight of 189kg with ABS. The fuel tank has a capacity of 20 liters.

KTM 790 Adventure 2019

Moving on to the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020, it is equipped with an inline triple-cylinder engine with a displacement of 888cc. The engine produces 95.2 horsepower and 87 Nm of torque, offering strong and smooth power delivery. Similar to the KTM, it features a chain transmission and has a 3-cylinder configuration. The suspension system consists of a telescopic fork with a 45mm diameter in the front and a swingarm with a monoshock in the rear, both provided by Showa. The front suspension offers a travel of 240mm, while the rear suspension provides a travel of 230mm. This setup allows for excellent off-road performance and comfortable riding on various terrains. The chassis is made of steel and has a rake of 65.6 degrees and a trail of 145.8mm, providing stability and agility. The bike is equipped with dual-disc brakes in the front, ensuring reliable stopping power. In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 features riding modes, ABS for curves, ride-by-wire, and traction control. It has a 21-inch front tire diameter, a 150mm rear tire width, and a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase is slightly longer than the KTM at 1551mm, and the seat height ranges from 850mm to 870mm. The dry weight of the bike with ABS is 201kg, slightly heavier than the KTM. The fuel tank has a capacity of 20 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 790 Adventure 2019 offers a motor with different modes and character, extremely high chassis stability, impeccable brakes, tremendous off-road capabilities, and low average fuel consumption. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 has a three-cylinder engine with character, significantly improved off-road capabilities, comfortable suspension elements, a quick gearbox with a blipper as standard, generous standard equipment including heated seats for both the rider and passenger, good ergonomics, good wind and weather protection, and long-distance capability.

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020

Regarding weaknesses, the KTM 790 Adventure 2019 has a less attractive pricing policy and the original seat does not have the ideal shape. The Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 has less robust handguards for off-road use and a cluster of switches on the left handlebar that can be overwhelming.

In conclusion, both the KTM 790 Adventure 2019 and the Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro 2020 are impressive off-road motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a powerful engine and excellent off-road capabilities, while the Triumph provides a characterful engine, improved off-road performance, and generous standard features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.