BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. Suzuki GSR 750 2011
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Suzuki GSR 750 2011
Visão geral - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs Suzuki GSR 750 2011
The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 are both naked bikes with inline engines and four cylinders. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a significant advantage with 160 horsepower compared to the Suzuki GSR 750 2011's 106 horsepower. This makes the BMW more suitable for those looking for extreme power and performance. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 80 Nm.
Both bikes have double tube frames, but the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has an aluminum frame, while the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 has a steel frame. The aluminum frame of the BMW provides a lighter and more rigid structure, contributing to better handling and agility.
In terms of braking, both bikes have double disc brakes at the front, but the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has four-piston calipers, while the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 has dual-piston calipers. This means that the BMW offers better braking performance and control.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
In terms of dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a wider rear tire of 190 mm compared to the Suzuki GSR 750 2011's 180 mm. The BMW also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the Suzuki's 1450 mm.
In terms of seat height, both bikes have similar measurements with the BMW S 1000 R 2014 at 814 mm and the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 at 815 mm. Both bikes also have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic aids, and a great price-to-performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on the racetrack as well as on rural roads.
Suzuki GSR 750 2011
On the other hand, the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 has a powerful engine, an aggressive appearance, optimal comfort, and a firm and sporty chassis.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine operation, and while the Dynamic Damping Control (DDC) works well, it can still be a bit stiff. The seat height is relatively high, and the design is subjective.
The Suzuki GSR 750 2011, on the other hand, may require additional investments for extreme speeds.
Overall, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers more power and performance, while the Suzuki GSR 750 2011 provides a comfortable and sporty riding experience. The choice between the two models ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas BMW S 1000 R 2014 em comparação com Suzuki GSR 750 2011
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Potência brutal, eletrónica suave, quase perfeita, só melhora com a HP4. Agora a BMW domina a classe das motos naked de 1000cc depois das superbikes.
Suzuki GSR 750 2011
O motor da GSX-R foi despojado de potência e recebeu ainda mais suavidade. Não se sente falta do primeiro, mas aprecia-se ainda mais o segundo. Em suma, a GSR oferece certamente potencial suficiente para todos os níveis de desempenho nas estradas públicas, e certamente também não se irá enganar com ela nas pistas de corrida.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW S 1000 R vs Suzuki GSR 750
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a Suzuki GSR 750 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 67% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSR 750 2011 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 13. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSR 750 with 53 days compared to 70 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 12 reviews for the Suzuki GSR 750 since model year 2011. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17 300 views. This compares to more than 5 400 views for the first review on Suzuki GSR 750 published on 05/10/2010.
