Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Visão geral - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 350 2017
The Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 350 2017 are both off-road motorcycles designed for different purposes. The TE 300 is an enduro bike, while the FC 350 is a motocross bike.
Starting with the engine specifications, the TE 300 has a 293.2cc 2-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 72mm. It features both electric and kick start options and is known for its lightweight and powerful performance. On the other hand, the FC 350 has a 349.7cc 4-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 88mm and 57.5mm respectively. It only has an electric start option and is known for its smooth power delivery and excellent traction.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature WP suspension systems. The TE 300 has a telescopic upside-down fork at the front and a deflection shock absorber at the rear. The FC 350 also has a telescopic upside-down fork at the front and a deflection shock absorber at the rear. However, there have been some complaints about the FC 350's fork diving too much under heavy braking.
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design, providing a strong and rigid chassis. They also have similar wheel sizes, with a 21-inch front wheel and an 18-inch rear wheel for the TE 300, and an 21-inch front wheel and a 19-inch rear wheel for the FC 350. However, the TE 300 has wider tires than the FC 350, with a 90mm front tire and a 140mm rear tire, compared to the FC 350's 80mm front tire and 110mm rear tire.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the FC 350 is slightly larger and heavier than the TE 300. The FC 350 has a longer wheelbase of 1495mm compared to the TE 300's 1482mm, and a higher seat height of 992mm compared to the TE 300's 960mm. The FC 350 also weighs slightly more at 106.4kg, while the TE 300 weighs 104.6kg. Additionally, the FC 350 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 7.5 liters compared to the TE 300's 11 liters.
In terms of strengths, the TE 300 is praised for its lightweight and powerful performance. It is known for its easy-to-control engine and excellent traction in the lower RPM range, while still providing ample power in the higher RPM range. It is also considered to be cost-effective with low maintenance requirements and high reliability.
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
On the other hand, the FC 350 is praised for its good traction and well-dosed brakes. It offers a smooth power delivery and is known for its excellent handling on motocross tracks.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The TE 300 can be more demanding and tiring during connection phases compared to a 4-stroke engine. It also has a shorter range due to its smaller fuel tank capacity. The FC 350 has been criticized for its fork diving too much under heavy braking and having a narrow brake pressure point.
In conclusion, the Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 350 2017 are both capable off-road motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The TE 300 is a lightweight and powerful 2-stroke enduro bike, while the FC 350 is a smooth and well-handling 4-stroke motocross bike. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.
Especificações técnicas Husqvarna TE 300 2015 em comparação com Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
A máquina de competição para os entusiastas dos dois tempos. Perfeitamente afinada e rápida como uma flecha. Um bestseller na gama Husvqarna! E com razão! No teste, também a experimentámos em combinação com uma embraiagem Rekluse. Mas o pacote geral parecia um pouco nervoso demais. A TE300 é melhor apreciada com uma embraiagem convencional.
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
A Husqvarna FC 350 oferece um pacote geral de sucesso que difere da KTM 350 EXC-F de construção idêntica nos detalhes. A potente unidade impressiona com uma potência limpa, mesmo quando o motor tem de ser mantido a altas rotações. Em termos de manuseamento, a forquilha da Husqvarna FC 350 inclina-se demasiado, o que torna a condução um pouco angular. Os travões, por outro lado, são fáceis de aplicar, mesmo que o ponto de pressão seja muito apertado.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna FC 350
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 350 2017. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 37 days compared to 94 days for a Husqvarna FC 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 and 3 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna TE 300 was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 6 800 views. This compares to more than 66 200 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 350 published on 06/11/2017.
