Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Visão geral - Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 are both naked bikes with inline engines and liquid cooling. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 boasts a more impressive engine with 123 horsepower, compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011's 72 horsepower. This means that the Triumph offers a more exhilarating and sporty riding experience, with faster acceleration and higher top speeds.
The torque output of the Triumph is also higher at 77 Nm, compared to the Kawasaki's 66 Nm. This means that the Triumph has more low-end grunt and better mid-range power delivery, making it more responsive and easier to ride in various conditions.
Both bikes feature monoshock rear suspension, which provides a comfortable and stable ride. However, the Triumph's aluminum frame offers better rigidity and handling characteristics compared to the Kawasaki's steel frame. This translates into more precise and agile cornering for the Triumph.
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
In terms of braking performance, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 comes equipped with a dual-disc setup with four-piston calipers and radial monobloc technology. This provides excellent stopping power and improved heat dissipation, resulting in more consistent braking performance. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 features dual-disc brakes with dual-piston calipers and petal technology, which still offer good braking performance but may not be as advanced as the Triumph's setup.
In terms of dimensions, both bikes have the same width for the front tire at 120mm. However, the Triumph has a wider rear tire at 180mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 160mm. This wider rear tire provides better grip and stability, especially during aggressive cornering.
The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1410mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 1410mm. This longer wheelbase contributes to better stability at high speeds for the Triumph.
In terms of seat height, the Triumph has a higher seat at 825mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 790mm. This may make the Triumph less accessible for shorter riders.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Both bikes have a decent fuel capacity, with the Triumph having a larger 17.4-liter tank compared to the Kawasaki's 15.5-liter tank. This means that the Triumph can go further on a full tank of fuel.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quick-shifting gearbox, a thrilling exhaust note, excellent braking system with ABS and traction control, a stylish appearance, and a relatively low weight. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has the advantage of ABS, a wider handlebar, a slimmer waist, a more pronounced intake noise, a comfortable seat, and a simple chassis.
As for weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 only has a complicated navigation menu, while the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has no notable weaknesses.
In conclusion, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 offers superior performance, handling, and braking capabilities compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. However, the Kawasaki has its own strengths, such as ABS and a comfortable seat. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 em comparação com Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
O modelo de topo entre as Street Triples merece plenamente a designação. Mais desportivo em todos os aspectos do que a versão R, o RS apresenta-se na estrada rural como uma máquina divertida que tem poucos adversários a temer. Os trackdays na pista de corridas também são um problema, especialmente porque o motor é muito afiado, os travões Brembo são super desportivos e a suspensão com o amortecedor Öhlins é maravilhosamente precisa. De qualquer forma, o manuseamento é impressionante e a Street Triple continua a ser a mais leve da sua classe. A alavanca de mudanças rápida de série consolida ainda mais a posição do modelo de topo.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Não vai encontrar um pacote tão coerente com detalhes tão finos em qualquer outro lugar a este preço. O ER-6n voltou a ser um pouco mais nítido, tanto visual como dinamicamente, e é mais divertido do que nunca.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Triumph Street Triple 765 RS vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is about 121% higher. A Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 experiences a loss of 20 EUR in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 290 EUR for a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. Compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 there are less Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 49 days compared to 67 days for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS was published on 10/01/2017 and now has more than 58 400 views. This compares to more than 11 200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 29/06/2005.
