Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with 2 cylinders and liquid cooling. The Kawasaki has a displacement of 649cc, while the Yamaha has a slightly larger displacement of 689cc.
In terms of power, the Yamaha has a slight advantage with 75 horsepower compared to the Kawasaki's 72 horsepower. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 68 Nm, while the Kawasaki has a torque of 64 Nm.
Both bikes have a steel frame and dual disc brakes at the front. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are also similar, with both having a front tire width of 120mm, a rear tire width of 17 inches, and a wheelbase of around 1400-1410mm. The seat height is also the same at 805mm.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
However, there are some differences between the two bikes. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a wider rear tire at 180mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 160mm rear tire. The Yamaha also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400mm.
In terms of weight, the Yamaha is significantly lighter than the Kawasaki. The Yamaha has a curb weight of 179kg, while the Kawasaki weighs 204kg. The weight difference is even more pronounced when considering the bikes with ABS, with the Yamaha weighing 182kg and the Kawasaki weighing 208kg.
The fuel tank capacity is also different, with the Kawasaki having a larger capacity of 16 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a number of strengths including a very agile engine, easy handling, low weight, aggressive and angular appearance, powerful brakes, comfortable seating position, distinctive sound, and an extensive and easy-to-read display.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Kawasaki is criticized for having weak brakes, while the Yamaha has a slightly soft chassis and foot pegs that can quickly scrape the ground. The Yamaha also has some cheap plastic parts and a boring telescopic fork.
In conclusion, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are capable naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, the Yamaha has some advantages in terms of power, weight, and certain features. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, is praised for its solid handling and high quality. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 em comparação com Yamaha MT-07 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
O motor é potente e muito divertido, e o ER brilha com um acabamento japonês meticuloso e um preço de combate.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
A MT-07 é uma máquina incrivelmente divertida e extremamente desportiva de conduzir. Os travões são potentes, o comportamento é soberbo e o motor é atualmente, de longe, o motor mais ágil desta classe - e mesmo acima.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 51 days for a Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11 200 views. This compares to more than 12 600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 04/11/2013.
