Honda CB650F 2014 vs. Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
Honda CB650F 2014
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
Pregled - Honda CB650F 2014 vs Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
The Honda CB650F model year 2014 and the Honda CB 600 F Hornet model year 2005 are both naked bikes with similar engine and drive train specifications. The CB650F has an engine power of 87 HP, while the CB 600 F Hornet has a slightly higher engine power of 97 HP. Both bikes have 4 cylinders and liquid cooling systems. The CB650F has a displacement of 649 ccm, while the CB 600 F Hornet has a slightly smaller displacement of 599 ccm.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the CB650F has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the CB 600 F Hornet's 1420 mm. The seat height of the CB650F is also slightly higher at 810 mm, while the CB 600 F Hornet has a seat height of 790 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the CB650F is 17.3 l, while the CB 600 F Hornet has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 18 l.
Honda CB650F 2014
The Honda CB650F 2014 has several strengths. It allows for excellent braking manoeuvres, thanks to its braking system. It also has a successful, sporty appearance that appeals to riders looking for a stylish bike. Additionally, the CB650F offers an upright and comfortable seating position, ensuring a comfortable ride for long distances.
On the other hand, the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 has its own set of strengths. It features an upside-down fork, which enhances its handling capabilities. The Hornet also has a fresher design compared to the CB650F, giving it a more modern look. The engine of the Hornet is sportier and more powerful, providing riders with a thrilling riding experience. The chassis of the Hornet is well-designed, contributing to its overall performance. The seating position is comfortable, and the braking system is reliable. Additionally, the Hornet is lightweight, making it easy to handle. It is also known for its reliability and has a wide range of accessories available for customization.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
In terms of weaknesses, the CB650F does not have any specific weaknesses listed. On the other hand, the CB 600 F Hornet has a lack of wind protection, which may affect the rider's comfort during high-speed rides. Additionally, the torque from the lower RPM range is somewhat poor, which may affect the bike's acceleration.
In summary, the Honda CB650F 2014 and the Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The CB650F offers excellent braking manoeuvres, a sporty appearance, and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the CB 600 F Hornet has a fresher design, a sportier engine, increased power, and a range of accessories available. However, it lacks wind protection and may have a weaker torque in the lower RPM range.
Tehničke specifikacije Honda CB650F 2014 u odnosu na Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Honda CB650F 2014
The look is successful, the brakes surprisingly powerful, the chassis an impeccable compromise and the engine a smooth and confident comrade. For this coherent and high-quality combination, the introductory price of just under 8,000 euros is acceptable.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005
When it comes to value for money, the Hornet is right up there with other brands this year. For little money, you get almost 100 hp, a cool design, a nimble bike and the guarantee of many great motorbike trips.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Honda CB650F vs Honda CB 600 F Hornet
There are a few key differences between a Honda CB650F 2014 and a Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB650F with 45 days compared to 60 days for a Honda CB 600 F Hornet. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the Honda CB650F and 15 reviews for the Honda CB 600 F Hornet since model year 2005. The first review for the Honda CB650F was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 14,100 views. This compares to more than 16,800 views for the first review on Honda CB 600 F Hornet published on 2/16/2005.
