Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline 2-cylinder engines with liquid cooling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slight advantage with 75 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011's 72 HP. The torque is also slightly higher on the Yamaha MT-07 with 68 Nm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 66 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 650ccm.

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame, which provides stability and durability. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1410mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 1400mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its powerful brakes, which provide excellent stopping power. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 also has ABS, which enhances safety by preventing the wheels from locking up during hard braking.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is lighter than the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. The Yamaha MT-07 has a kerb weight of 179 kg (182 kg with ABS), while the Kawasaki ER-6n weighs 204 kg (208 kg with ABS). The Yamaha MT-07 also has a slightly lower seat height of 805mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 790mm.

In terms of tire width, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm. However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a wider rear tire with a width of 180mm, compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011's 160mm rear tire. This may provide better traction and stability for the Yamaha MT-07.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has a larger capacity of 15.5 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 14 liters. This may result in a longer range for the Kawasaki ER-6n.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has ABS, wider handlebars, a slimmer waist, increased intake noise, a comfortable seat, and an uncomplicated chassis. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a very agile engine, very easy handling, low weight, an aggressively angular look, powerful brakes, a comfortable seating position, a throaty sound, and an extensive and easy-to-read display.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 does not have any notable weaknesses. However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly soft chassis, footrests that may drag, partly cheap plastic parts, and a boring telescopic fork.

Overall, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are solid naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as power, weight, handling, and design.