Kawasaki Z 300 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2013

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Loading...

Pregled - Kawasaki Z 300 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2013

The Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a slight advantage with 44 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 39 HP. Similarly, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 27 Nm. However, it is important to note that the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a single cylinder engine, while the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 has a two-cylinder engine. This difference in engine configuration may result in different performance characteristics.

The chassis of the two bikes also differ. The Kawasaki Z 300 2016 features a steel frame, while the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. This variation in frame material may affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

When it comes to braking technology, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has an advantage with four-piston front brakes and radial technology. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 has double piston front brakes with petal technology. This variation in braking systems may result in differences in braking performance and feel.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have similar front tire widths and diameters. However, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a wider rear tire width of 150 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 140 mm. Additionally, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a shorter wheelbase of 1367 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 1405 mm. The seat height of the KTM 390 Duke 2013 is also slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 785 mm. Furthermore, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 is significantly lighter with a kerb weight of 139 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 168 kg. Lastly, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 11 liters compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016's 17 liters.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 offers an adult look, high-quality finish, a high-revving engine, comfortable seating position, stable brakes, an easy-to-read and complete cockpit, and low fuel consumption. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 is praised for its light weight, sufficient power, and low fuel consumption.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 has a very unobtrusive sound, favorable chassis components, and an engine that only starts when idling. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 lacks chassis adjustment options and may have lower comfort levels.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2013 have their own strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style when choosing between the two models.

Tehničke specifikacije Kawasaki Z 300 2016 u odnosu na KTM 390 Duke 2013

Kawasaki Z 300 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2013

Motor i pogonski sustav

ProvrtProvrt62 mmProvrt89 mm
TaktTakt49 mmTakt60 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora39 KSSnaga motora44 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi11,000 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment27 NmOkretni moment35 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu10,000 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,250 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije10.6 Stupanj kompresije12.6
PokretačPokretačElektrični sustavPokretačElektrični sustav
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri2Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak296 ccmPomak375 ccm

Šasija

OkvirOkvirČelikOkvirKrom-molibden

Prednje kočnice

KlipKlipDva klipaKlipČetiri klipa
Nosač amortizeraNosač amortizeraKlizna čeljustNosač amortizeraFiksna čeljust
TehnologijaTehnologijaLaticaTehnologijaradijalno

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk
KlipKlipDva klipaKlipJedan klip
Nosač amortizeraNosač amortizeraKlizna čeljustNosač amortizeraKlizna čeljust

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume110 mmŠirina prednje gume110 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume140 mmŠirina stražnje gume150 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume70 %Visina stražnje gume60 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,405 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,367 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala785 mmVisina sjedala800 mm
Težina neopterećenog vozilaTežina neopterećenog vozila168 kgTežina neopterećenog vozila139 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo17 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceA2Sukladnost licenceA2

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

The cool design of the Kawasaki Z300, which is extremely similar to that of its big sister Z800, makes it a very grown-up-looking motorbike. The stable braking system and the easy-to-read cockpit with an analogue rev counter and all the necessary features fit in very well with this image. Thanks to the 170 kg ready-to-ride weight, the bike is extremely easy to handle and playful. The engine only reveals its potential in the upper rev range, but revs up willingly and makes you want to ride in a sporty manner. Only the comfort-oriented chassis cannot quite cope with radically sporty demands - but this is quite legitimate and understandable for an entry-level motorbike.

Adult look

high-quality finish

high-revving engine

comfortable seating position

stable brake

easy-to-read, complete cockpit

low fuel consumption.

Very unobtrusive sound

favourable chassis components

engine only starts when idling

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Kawasaki Z 300 vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2013. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 43 days compared to 88 days for the Kawasaki Z 300. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 300 and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki Z 300 was published on 11/4/2014 and now has more than 59,800 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Cijena Kawasaki Z 300

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena KTM 390 Duke

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH