Yamaha MT-07 2017 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Pregled - Yamaha MT-07 2017 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-07 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 have several similarities. Both bikes have an in-line engine with 2 cylinders and liquid cooling. The Yamaha MT-07 has a slightly larger engine displacement at 689cc compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 649cc. In terms of power, the Yamaha MT-07 has a slight advantage with 75 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 72 HP. The torque of the Yamaha MT-07 is also slightly higher at 68 Nm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 64 Nm.
Both bikes have a steel frame and double disk front brakes. The front tire width and diameter are the same for both bikes at 120mm and 17 inches respectively. However, the Yamaha MT-07 has a wider rear tire at 180mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 160mm. The wheelbase of the Yamaha MT-07 is slightly shorter at 1400mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 1410mm. Both bikes have the same seat height at 805mm.
Yamaha MT-07 2017
In terms of weight, the Yamaha MT-07 is lighter with a kerb weight of 179kg compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 204kg. With ABS, the weight of the Yamaha MT-07 increases to 182kg, while the Kawasaki ER-6n with ABS weighs 208kg. The fuel tank capacity of the Yamaha MT-07 is 14 liters, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a larger fuel tank capacity of 16 liters.
Now let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-07 has a great motor, providing a powerful and enjoyable riding experience. It also has an easy-to-read display, making it convenient for the rider to monitor important information while riding. Additionally, the Yamaha MT-07 is known for its relatively low price, offering good value for money.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n is praised for its solid handling, allowing the rider to confidently navigate corners and curves. It also has a high-quality level, indicating that the bike is well-built and durable.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
However, the Yamaha MT-07 does have a weakness in its chassis, which is considered to be too soft by some riders. This may affect the bike's stability and handling in certain situations. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n is criticized for its weak brake, which may compromise the bike's stopping power and safety.
In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-07 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-07 offers a great motor, an easy-to-read display, and a low price. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n excels in solid handling and high-quality construction. However, the Yamaha MT-07's chassis may be too soft, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a weak brake. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's personal preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije Yamaha MT-07 2017 u odnosu na Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Yamaha MT-07 2017
Even after three years, the Yamaha MT-07 is still a public favourite. No one else beats such a price-performance ratio. The two-cylinder engine is powerful, but can be dosed very gently at low revs. The display is also one of the best in this class, with good readability. Only the chassis is disappointing. In a sporty riding style, it is simply too soft, which can cause the MT-07 to sway.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Yamaha MT-07 vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-07 2017 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 20. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 83 days for the Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Yamaha MT-07 was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 12,600 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.
