BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Loading...

Pregled - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2016

The BMW G 310 R and the KTM 390 Duke are both naked bikes from the year 2016. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW G 310 R is equipped with a 313cc single-cylinder engine that produces 34 horsepower and 28 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke features a slightly larger 373.2cc single-cylinder engine that delivers 44 horsepower and 35 Nm of torque. This gives the KTM 390 Duke an advantage in terms of power, providing a more thrilling riding experience.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. This design helps to improve stability and handling, making them suitable for both city riding and more spirited rides on winding roads.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW G 310 R has a steel frame, while the KTM 390 Duke boasts a chromium-molybdenum frame. The KTM's frame is known for its strength and rigidity, which enhances the bike's overall stability and handling.

In terms of braking, both bikes have single disk brakes at the front. This provides adequate stopping power, ensuring safety while riding. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, which may require some adjustments or modifications for optimal performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW G 310 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1374mm compared to the KTM 390 Duke's 1367mm. The seat height of the BMW G 310 R is also slightly lower at 785mm, while the KTM 390 Duke has a seat height of 800mm. These differences in dimensions may affect the overall riding experience and comfort for different riders.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

When it comes to weight, the KTM 390 Duke has a significant advantage, weighing only 139kg with ABS compared to the BMW G 310 R's 158.5kg with ABS. This lower weight contributes to the KTM's high fun factor and nimble handling, making it a popular choice for riders who prioritize agility and maneuverability.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, both bikes have an 11-liter capacity, providing a decent range for city commuting and shorter rides.

In summary, the BMW G 310 R excels in handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke stands out for its low weight, sufficient power, high fun factor, and low consumption. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, while the KTM 390 Duke has been criticized for its sluggish clutch and small geometry. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Tehničke specifikacije BMW G 310 R 2016 u odnosu na KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016

Motor i pogonski sustav

ProvrtProvrt80 mmProvrt89 mm
TaktTakt62 mmTakt60 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora34 KSSnaga motora44 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment28 NmOkretni moment35 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,250 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije10.6 Stupanj kompresije12.6
PokretačPokretačElektrični sustavPokretačElektrični sustav
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak313 ccmPomak373.2 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica

Stražnji ovjes

Nosač amortizeraNosač amortizeraizravnoNosač amortizeraizravno

Šasija

OkvirOkvirČelikOkvirKrom-molibden
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraCjevastaVrsta okviraCjevasta

Prednje kočnice

VrstaVrstaJedan diskVrstaJedan disk

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume110 mmŠirina prednje gume110 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume150 mmŠirina stražnje gume150 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume60 %Visina stražnje gume60 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,374 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,367 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala785 mmVisina sjedala800 mm
Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)158.5 kgTežina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)139 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceA2Sukladnost licenceA2

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The KTM 390 Duke is a really good compromise between sportiness, reason, riding comfort, fun and price. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a compromise at all, but like it's ready to race.

Low weight

sufficient power

high fun factor

low consumption

Sluggish clutch

small geometry

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW G 310 R vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2016. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 10/7/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Cijena BMW G 310 R

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena KTM 390 Duke

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH