Husqvarna WR 125 2006 vs. Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 125 2006 compared to Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2006
Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Motor i pogonski sustav

PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktDvotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak125 ccmPomak249.91 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,465 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,482 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala970 mmVisina sjedala970 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine99 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine107.5 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo8.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo9.5 l (nisko)

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

The entry-level four-stroke has also gained some more power. Nevertheless, the 250 remains almost foolproof and easy to ride. Secretly my favourite of the new 2017 models. Combines easy handling with a good-natured yet powerful engine.

Very easy to ride

the most beginner-friendly bike

most relaxed ride

She runs out of steam on endless steep rides

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 125 vs Husqvarna FE 250

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons