Kawasaki ER-6n 2009 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2009 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Motor i pogonski sustav

Snaga motoraSnaga motora72 KSSnaga motora130 KS
CilindriCilindri2Cilindri3
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
PomakPomak649 ccmPomak1,050 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala785 mmVisina sjedala815 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine204 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine189 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo15.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo18 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2009

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2006

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons