BMW R 1250 GS 2021 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
Pregled - BMW R 1250 GS 2021 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
The BMW R 1250 GS 2021 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 are both popular models in the enduro motorcycle category. While they share some similarities in terms of specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is equipped with a Boxer engine, while the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 has a V2 engine. The BMW has a larger bore of 102.5 mm compared to the Suzuki's 100 mm, which may result in slightly more power and torque. The BMW also has a higher engine power of 136 HP and torque of 143 Nm, compared to the Suzuki's 101 HP and 101 Nm. Both motorcycles have electric starters and different transmission systems, with the BMW using a prop shaft and the Suzuki utilizing a chain.
In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 features a telelever front suspension with a diameter of 37 mm and a travel of 190 mm. The rear suspension is a single swing arm with a monoshock and a travel of 200 mm. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019, on the other hand, has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 43 mm and a travel of 160 mm. The rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock and a travel of 160 mm. Both motorcycles offer preload and rebound adjustments for the suspension.
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
When it comes to the chassis, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 has a steel frame with a load-bearing engine design. It has a rake of 62.9 degrees and a trail of 109 mm. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. It has a slightly steeper rake of 64.5 degrees and the same trail of 109 mm.
In terms of brakes, both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front. The BMW R 1250 GS 2021 offers advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, anti-slipping control, hill start assist, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 also has ABS and traction control, but its electronics package is not as advanced as the BMW's.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The BMW has a slightly wider rear tire width of 170 mm compared to the Suzuki's 150 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is 1525 mm, while the Suzuki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1555 mm. Both motorcycles have a seat height of 850 mm and a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters. The BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 249 kg, compared to the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019's 232 kg.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 offers great ride comfort and ergonomics, a powerful engine, a great connectivity app, an easy-to-read display, a confident feel in the saddle, practical riding aids, and a versatile chassis that can accommodate every route. The Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 is praised for its V2 engine full of character, mature technology, stable handling, ABS curves, comfortable seating position, easy-to-read instruments, and being the perfect touring enduro for purists.
However, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 does have a rough overall appearance and its gearshifts at low revs may be somewhat clumsy. On the other hand, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 is considered to be technically not up to date, and its electronics package cannot keep up with the competition.
In conclusion, both the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 and the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a more advanced electronics package and a more powerful engine, while the Suzuki provides a comfortable seating position and stable handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two motorcycles will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije BMW R 1250 GS 2021 u odnosu na Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
The GS also impressed us with its versatility during the test in November 2021. We rode the bike on a wide variety of terrain and were once again very satisfied. The motorbike convinces in every situation with its easy handling and practicality. On the other hand, it can also be ridden delightfully irrationally.
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019
Even though Suzuki may not have put as much work into the development of the V-Strom as its competitors in touring enduros, the Suzuki can use this circumstance to its advantage. In a world with extensive electronics packages, it still looks very purist in the 2019 model year, with only the cornering ABS hinting at innovation. Many customers want a simple motorbike, and the V-Strom 1000 appeals to precisely this target group. Its lusty V2 exudes endless character and, thanks to years of testing, is a bulletproof companion. Combined with the potent chassis and relaxed seating position, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 gives you a sporty touring enduro that stands up to the digitalisation of motorbikes in today's world.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW R 1250 GS vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1250 GS 2021 and a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is about 93% higher. A BMW R 1250 GS 2021 experiences a loss of 350 USD in one year and 290 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,560 USD and 1,780 USD for a Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019. Compared to Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2019 there are more BMW R 1250 GS 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 66 compared to 7. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1250 GS with 55 days compared to 113 days for a Suzuki V-Strom 1000. Since model year 2019 1000PS.de editors have written 50 reviews for the BMW R 1250 GS and 40 reviews for the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW R 1250 GS was published on 9/19/2018 and now has more than 305,600 views. This compares to more than 6,300 views for the first review on Suzuki V-Strom 1000 published on 7/23/2002.
