Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of engine specifications, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in power and torque. The Speed Triple has a more powerful engine with 132 HP compared to the Z900's 125.4 HP. Similarly, the Speed Triple has higher torque at 110 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. The Speed Triple has three cylinders, while the Z900 has four.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, there are differences in adjustment options. The Speed Triple offers compression and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension, while the Z900 only offers preload and rebound adjustments for both.

When it comes to the chassis, the Speed Triple has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. This can affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Both bikes have four-piston front brakes, but there are differences in the braking technology. The Speed Triple utilizes radial technology, while the Z900 uses petal technology. This can affect the braking performance and feel.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there are differences in the rear tire width, with the Speed Triple having a wider 190 mm tire compared to the Z900's 180 mm tire. The wheelbase of the Speed Triple is slightly shorter at 1437 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. Additionally, the seat height of the Speed Triple is higher at 828 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also considered to be an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.

However, there are some weaknesses mentioned for both bikes. The Speed Triple is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disturb the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Z900 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders, but this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities in terms of performance, handling, and comfort.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Kawasaki Z900 2017

Motor i pogonski sustav

Vrsta motoraVrsta motoraUgrađenoVrsta motoraUgrađeno
ProvrtProvrt79 mmProvrt73.4 mm
TaktTakt71.4 mmTakt56 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora132 KSSnaga motora125.4 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,250 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment110 NmOkretni moment98.6 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,700 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije12 Stupanj kompresije11.8
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
Broj brzinaBroj brzina6Broj brzina6
CilindriCilindri3Cilindri4
Ventila po cilindruVentila po cilindru4Ventila po cilindru4
VentiliVentiliDOHCVentiliDOHC
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
PomakPomak1,050 ccmPomak948 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica
PrilagodbaPrilagodbaKompresija, PovratPrilagodbaPredopterećenje, Povrat

Stražnji ovjes

PrilagodbaPrilagodbaKompresija, PovratPrilagodbaPredopterećenje, Povrat

Šasija

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirČelik
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraDvije ispušne cijeviVrsta okviraDvostruka podloga

Prednje kočnice

KlipKlipČetiri klipaKlipČetiri klipa
Nosač amortizeraNosač amortizeraFiksna čeljustNosač amortizeraFiksna čeljust
TehnologijaTehnologijaradijalnoTehnologijaLatica

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk
KlipKlipDva klipaKlipJedan klip

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume120 mmŠirina prednje gume120 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume190 mmŠirina stražnje gume180 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume55 %Visina stražnje gume55 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
DužinaDužina2,086 mmDužina2,070 mm
ŠirinaŠirina728 mmŠirina820 mm
VisinaVisina1,120 mmVisina1,065 mm
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,437 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,450 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala828 mmVisina sjedala795 mm
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2017 is about 37% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 USD and 920 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2017. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 43. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons