Beta RR 250 2T 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Loading...

Overview - Beta RR 250 2T 2013 vs Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Technical Specifications Beta RR 250 2T 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Beta RR 250 2T 2013
Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Motor i pogonski sustav

PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktDvotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
PomakPomak249 ccmPomak449 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,482 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,460 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala930 mmVisina sjedala975 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine104 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine116 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo9.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo9 l (nisko)

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Beta RR 250 2T 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Very powerful engine and good performance in the MX special stage. Clean straight-line running in deep soil. Swedish steel is back! The Husky brings even heavier kilos wonderfully smoothly through the worst mud pits and up the steep slope without any problems.

Positive handling

low price

stability

decent performance

robust.

Agility

complicated handling - requires strength.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 250 2T vs Husqvarna TE 450

Price Beta RR 250 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons