Triumph Daytona 675 2008 vs. BMW F 700 GS 2016
Triumph Daytona 675 2008
BMW F 700 GS 2016
Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 675 2008 compared to BMW F 700 GS 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Daytona 675 2008
The Daytona has always been a good bike. The changes to the chassis are nice and, together with the new tyres, make the Daytona more manageable and faster. But the real plus point is the increased performance in the upper rev range.
BMW F 700 GS 2016
The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.
