BMW R 1200 GS 2012 vs. KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
Pregled - BMW R 1200 GS 2012 vs KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
The BMW R 1200 GS model year 2012 and the KTM 1050 Adventure model year 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they share some similarities in terms of seat height and engine displacement, there are notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.
Starting with the BMW R 1200 GS 2012, it is equipped with a 1170cc engine that delivers 110 horsepower and 120 Nm of torque. The engine features a bore of 101mm and a stroke of 73mm, providing a good balance of power and efficiency. The transmission is a prop shaft, which offers smooth and reliable power delivery. The bike has a load-bearing engine frame type, ensuring stability and durability. The front suspension is a strut, providing optimal support and comfort. The rear tire width is 110mm, offering good traction and stability. The wheelbase is 1507mm, contributing to the bike's stability and maneuverability. The seat height is 850mm, providing a comfortable riding position for most riders. The fuel tank capacity is 20 liters, allowing for decent range.
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
The strengths of the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 include optimal wind protection, a comfortable seat, positive ergonomics, and a weather-robust design. The bike also has a quiet chassis, minimizing noise and vibrations for a smoother ride. However, one weakness of the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 is that the seat height may be a little too low for some riders.
Moving on to the KTM 1050 Adventure 2016, it is powered by a 1050cc engine that produces 95 horsepower and 107 Nm of torque. The engine has a bore of 103mm and a stroke of 63mm, providing a different power delivery compared to the BMW. The transmission is a chain, which offers a more direct and responsive feel. The bike has a tubular frame type, which is lightweight and offers good rigidity. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, providing excellent handling and control. The rear tire width is 150mm, offering increased traction for off-road adventures. The wheelbase is 1560mm, contributing to the bike's stability at higher speeds. The seat height is 850mm, similar to the BMW, ensuring a comfortable riding position. The fuel tank capacity is 23 liters, providing a larger range compared to the BMW.
KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
The strengths of the KTM 1050 Adventure 2016 include a powerful and refined engine, disengageable ABS, and adjustable traction control. The bike also offers agile handling, making it suitable for both on-road and off-road riding. The ergonomics are adjustable, allowing riders to find their optimal riding position. The KTM 1050 Adventure 2016 also has a prestigious look similar to its bigger sisters in the Adventure lineup. Additionally, the bike has a height-adjustable windshield, allowing riders to customize wind protection. Another advantage of the KTM is its comparatively affordable price. However, one weakness of the KTM 1050 Adventure 2016 is that the rev limiter kicks in at 8500 revs, limiting the top-end power. Additionally, the chassis may be a little too soft for serious off-road use.
In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 and the KTM 1050 Adventure 2016 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers optimal wind protection, a comfortable seat, and positive ergonomics, while the KTM boasts a powerful engine, adjustable features, and a more affordable price. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the motorcycle.
Tehničke specifikacije BMW R 1200 GS 2012 u odnosu na KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
Either it was a stroke of luck or the best developers were at work - handlebars, geometry, seat, knee angle, footrests - it just fits really well for the majority of Central Europeans. All in all, there is still no motorbike that can kill the GS.
KTM 1050 Adventure 2016
In my opinion, the KTM 1050 Adventure picks up where the 990 Adventure left off a few years ago: Around 100 hp of power, playful handling and as much or as little electronics as is currently state-of-the-art. The engine is anything but weak, ABS and traction control regulate safely and inconspicuously and the handling is extremely fun-oriented, partly because of the relatively narrow tyres. And all this at a price that is only undercut by a few competitors in the league of big touring enduros. Sad as it may be, the two 1190 Adventures and, above all, the flagship 1290 Super Adventure, have soared in price to very high levels. And that is precisely why the KTM 1050 Adventure is perhaps the most coherent of the four Adventure models.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena BMW R 1200 GS vs KTM 1050 Adventure
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2012 and a KTM 1050 Adventure 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 GS 2012 is about 27% higher. A BMW R 1200 GS 2012 experiences a loss of 570 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,350 USD and 1,980 USD for a KTM 1050 Adventure 2016. Compared to KTM 1050 Adventure 2016 there are more BMW R 1200 GS 2012 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 23 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 GS with 58 days compared to 96 days for a KTM 1050 Adventure. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 8 reviews for the KTM 1050 Adventure since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 1/20/2004 and now has more than 19,100 views. This compares to more than 10,900 views for the first review on KTM 1050 Adventure published on 11/4/2014.
