Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022 vs. Keeway Speed 125 2009

Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022

Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022

Keeway Speed 125 2009

Keeway Speed 125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022 compared to Keeway Speed 125 2009

Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022
Keeway Speed 125 2009

Motor i pogonski sustav

Snaga motoraSnaga motora14 KSSnaga motora11 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi10,250 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi8,000 okr./min
Broj brzinaBroj brzina5Broj brzina5
CilindriCilindri2Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjeZrak
PomakPomak124.7 ccmPomak125 ccm

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk

Dimenzije i težina

Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceA1Sukladnost licenceA1

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022

Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila 2022

If you like the look of big bobber bikes with powerful V2 engines, the Hyosung GV125 S Aquila is an interesting 125cc alternative. The look is really successful, the proportions are right and the Bonsai V2 is a real V2! However, the engine does not stand out noticeably from the usual single-cylinder competition. This may also be due to the comparatively high weight. Nevertheless, the GV125 S Aquila is a very agile and, thanks to the comfortable seating position, also very easy to ride bobber. A real recommendation for novice riders with an A1/B111/B196 licence.

Gorgeous bobber look

a real V2 engine

very comfortable seating position

low saddle height

very manoeuvrable despite higher weight

CBS brake as a safety feature

Engine rather unspectacular

CBS takes some getting used to

Keeway Speed 125 2009

Keeway Speed 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila vs Keeway Speed 125

Price Hyosung GV 125 S Aquila

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Keeway Speed 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons