KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs. BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

Loading...

Pregled - KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs BMW G 310 R 2016

The KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 are both naked bikes, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a more powerful engine with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 34 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the BMW's 28 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a similar displacement, with the KTM at 375 ccm and the BMW at 313 ccm.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic fork front suspensions and tubular frames. However, the KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame while the BMW has a steel frame. This could potentially affect the weight and handling of the bikes, with the BMW potentially being lighter and having better handling due to its ingenious chassis.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

In terms of brakes, both bikes have single disk front brakes and advanced rider assistance systems with ABS. However, the KTM does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could be a drawback for riders who prefer to customize their bike's suspension.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1367 mm compared to the BMW's 1374 mm. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, which could make it more agile and easier to handle. It also has sufficient power and a low consumption rate, which could be appealing to riders who want a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. These characteristics could make it a more enjoyable and stable ride, especially for riders who prioritize these aspects.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could limit customization and comfort for some riders. The BMW G 310 R 2016 has a weakness in its brake pedal, although the specific details of this weakness are not provided.

Overall, both the KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers more power and a lightweight design, while the BMW offers better handling and stability. Riders should consider their own preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.

Tehničke specifikacije KTM 390 Duke 2013 u odnosu na BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013
BMW G 310 R 2016

Motor i pogonski sustav

ProvrtProvrt89 mmProvrt80 mm
TaktTakt60 mmTakt62 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora44 KSSnaga motora34 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9,500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment35 NmOkretni moment28 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,250 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7,500 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije12.6 Stupanj kompresije10.6
PokretačPokretačElektrični sustavPokretačElektrični sustav
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak375 ccmPomak313 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica

Stražnji ovjes

Nosač amortizeraNosač amortizeraizravnoNosač amortizeraizravno

Šasija

OkvirOkvirKrom-molibdenOkvirČelik
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraCjevastaVrsta okviraCjevasta

Prednje kočnice

VrstaVrstaJedan diskVrstaJedan disk

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk

Sustavi za pomoć

Napredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuABSNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuABS

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume110 mmŠirina prednje gume110 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume150 mmŠirina stražnje gume150 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume60 %Visina stražnje gume60 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,367 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,374 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala800 mmVisina sjedala785 mm
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceA2Sukladnost licenceA2

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2013 and a BMW G 310 R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Cijena KTM 390 Duke

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena BMW G 310 R

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH