Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs. Yamaha R1 2006
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Yamaha R1 2006
Pregled - Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 vs Yamaha R1 2006
When comparing the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 model year 2005 and the Yamaha R1 model year 2006, there are several factors to consider.
In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 boasts 178 HP, while the Yamaha R1 has 172 HP. Both motorcycles have a 4-cylinder engine and a displacement of around 1000ccm. This means that both bikes offer similar power and performance capabilities.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1405 mm compared to the Yamaha R1's 1395 mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is also slightly lower at 810 mm, while the Yamaha sits higher at 835 mm. The dry weight of the Suzuki is 166 kg, slightly lighter than the Yamaha's 172 kg. Both bikes have an 18-liter fuel tank capacity, providing a decent range for long rides.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
When it comes to strengths, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 has a slim appearance, which gives it a sleek and aerodynamic look. It also features increased cam lift, resulting in improved performance. The bike is known for its excellent handling and has an anti-hopping clutch, which enhances control during aggressive downshifting. The brakes on the GSX-R 1000 are also highly regarded for their stopping power.
On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 has its own set of strengths. It is praised for its no-worry riveting, meaning that riders can push the bike to its limits without worrying about its performance. The R1 also has a strong braking system, allowing for quick and controlled stops. The engine on the Yamaha is powerful and provides ample acceleration. The bike is also equipped with a traction miracle, which helps maintain stability and control during acceleration. Additionally, the R1 features an anti-hopping clutch and a steering damper, which further enhance its performance and handling.
Yamaha R1 2006
In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 is not considered an oversized motorbike, which may be a drawback for riders looking for a larger and more imposing bike. Additionally, the seat height on the Suzuki is set a little too low for some riders, which may result in discomfort during long rides.
On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 has a very sub-optimal seating position, which can lead to an uncomfortable posture for riders. The bike also requires strong body effort during turns, which may be tiring for some riders.
In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 and the Yamaha R1 have their own set of strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a slim appearance, improved performance, and excellent handling, while the Yamaha boasts strong braking, a powerful engine, and advanced features like a traction miracle and steering damper. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities when choosing between these two bikes.
Tehničke specifikacije Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 u odnosu na Yamaha R1 2006
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
To sum up: "An absolutely awesome box that could actually be worth Euro 15,599!" The workmanship is good, the performance is high and the driving experience is very good.
Yamaha R1 2006
The new R1 is a motorbike full of high-tech and innovation. The performance offered on the race track is impressive. Because the technical gadgets translate into riding fun and lap times. Nevertheless, the bike demands an active rider to avoid becoming exhausting.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Suzuki GSX-R 1000 vs Yamaha R1
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 and a Yamaha R1 2006. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha R1 with 44 days compared to 47 days for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 and 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 was published on 3/3/2004 and now has more than 7,100 views. This compares to more than 3,900 views for the first review on Yamaha R1 published on 4/28/2003.
