Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Loading...

Pregled - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 350 2017 are both high-performance motorcycles designed for different purposes. The TE 300 is an enduro motorcycle, while the FC 350 is a motocross bike.

In terms of engine specifications, the TE 300 has a 293.2cc 2-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 72mm. It features an electric and kick starter, while the FC 350 has a 349.7cc 4-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 88mm and 57.5mm respectively. It only has an electric starter. Both bikes have a single cylinder configuration and use a chain transmission.

The suspension system on both bikes is similar, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a deflection shock mount at the rear. The suspension components are provided by WP for both models.

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design. This provides stability and durability for off-road riding.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the FC 350 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1495mm compared to the TE 300's 1482mm. The seat height of the FC 350 is also higher at 992mm compared to the TE 300's 960mm. The dry weight of the FC 350 is slightly heavier at 106.4kg compared to the TE 300's 104.6kg. The fuel tank capacity of the TE 300 is larger at 11 liters compared to the FC 350's 7.5 liters.

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The TE 300 has several strengths, including being lightweight, powerful, and extremely fast. Its engine is easy to control and provides lots of traction in the lower rev range, while still offering power for every situation in the upper rev range. Additionally, the TE 300 is inexpensive to run with minimal service costs and is known for its reliability.

On the other hand, the FC 350 is praised for its good traction and brakes with good dosing. However, it has a few weaknesses, including a fork that dips too far and a narrow brake pressure point.

In summary, the Husqvarna TE 300 2015 is a lightweight and powerful enduro motorcycle, known for its traction and reliability. The Husqvarna FC 350 2017, on the other hand, is a motocross bike with good traction and brakes, but has some issues with the fork and brake pressure.

Tehničke specifikacije Husqvarna TE 300 2015 u odnosu na Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Prikaži sve
Potpuno isto
Razlike
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica
Robna markaRobna markaWPRobna markaWP

Šasija

OkvirOkvirČelikOkvirČelik
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraSredišnja ispušna cijevVrsta okviraSredišnja ispušna cijev

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume90 mmŠirina prednje gume80 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume90 %Visina prednje gume100 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume21 inčPromjer prednje gume21 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume140 mmŠirina stražnje gume110 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume80 %Visina stražnje gume90 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume18 inčPromjer stražnje gume19 inč
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,482 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,495 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala960 mmVisina sjedala992 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine104.6 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine106.4 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo11 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo7.5 l (nisko)

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

The racing machine for two-stroke enthusiasts. Perfectly tuned and fast as an arrow. A bestseller in the Husvqarna range! And rightly so! In the test, we also tried it in combination with a Rekluse clutch. But the overall package seemed a little too nervous. The TE300 is best enjoyed with a conventional clutch.

Lightweight, powerful, extremely fast

engine easy to control

lots of traction in the lower rev range, power for every situation in the upper rev range

inexpensive to run, hardly any service costs

reliable! The huge engine runs 95% of the time at partial load anyway.

More nervous and strenuous on connecting stages than a four-stroke

lower range than with four-stroke

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The Husqvarna FC 350 offers a successful overall package that differs from the identically constructed KTM 350 EXC-F in the details. The powerful unit impresses with clean power, even when the engine has to be kept at high revs. In terms of handling, the fork of the Husqvarna FC 350 dips too much, which makes the ride a little angular. The brakes, on the other hand, are easy to apply, even if the pressure point is very tight.

Good traction

brakes with good dosing

Fork dips too far

narrow brake pressure point

Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna FC 350

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 350 2017. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 37 days compared to 94 days for a Husqvarna FC 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 and 3 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna TE 300 was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 66,200 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 350 published on 11/6/2017.

Cijena Husqvarna TE 300

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Cijena Husqvarna FC 350

Godina proizvodnje modela
Trenutačne prosječne tržišne cijene

Alternativne usporedbe

Partner platforme 1000PS

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG