KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2016
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Pregled - KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs Husqvarna FE 350 2016
The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have a bore of 88 mm and a stroke of 57.5 mm. They also have a one-cylinder engine with a displacement of 349.7 ccm. The front suspension on both bikes is an upside-down telescopic fork made by WP, and the rear suspension is also made by WP. Both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design. The front tire diameter is 21 inches, and the rear tire width is 140 mm with a diameter of 18 inches. The wheelbase and seat height are the same for both bikes, measuring at 1482 mm and 970 mm, respectively. The dry weight of the KTM 350 EXC-F is 107.2 kg, while the Husqvarna FE 350 weighs slightly more at 109.2 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the KTM is 9 liters, while the Husqvarna has a slightly larger capacity of 9.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the KTM 350 EXC-F is praised for its power, agility, and speed, making it a true racing machine. It combines the advantages of a four-stroke engine, such as responsive throttle, fuel efficiency, and smooth power delivery, with a lightweight design and sufficient power.
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
On the other hand, the Husqvarna FE 350 is known for being one of the fastest bikes on any special stage. It offers a great balance between easy handling and good performance, making it a popular choice for riders looking for a bike that is both capable and user-friendly.
However, the KTM 350 EXC-F has some weaknesses. It is described as more radical than the 250cc version and can be a bit more nervous to ride compared to the 450cc version. It requires more concentration from the rider but offers more speed. While the pull-through has improved, it is still not perfect, and riders may sometimes wish they had a more powerful 450cc engine.
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Similarly, the Husqvarna FE 350 has its weaknesses. It is noted to be clearly more aggressive than the FE 250, which means it can be more energy-consuming to ride. This may be a consideration for riders who prefer a bike that is less demanding physically.
In summary, both the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 are powerful and capable enduro motorcycles. The KTM offers a combination of lightweight design and sufficient power, while the Husqvarna excels in terms of speed and handling. However, the KTM can be more demanding to ride, and the Husqvarna may require more physical energy from the rider. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Tehničke specifikacije KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 u odnosu na Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
Prednosti i nedostaci u odnosu na
KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
The box-office hit of recent years has been improved with pinpoint accuracy. The usable rev range has been widened, making the 350 a little easier to ride than before. But it still feels like the most radical machine among the 4-stroke models. It combines the advantages of the "250" and "450" but also their disadvantages. Nevertheless: 90% of all KTM customers will set the fastest time on the special test with the 350 EXC-F. It is the most universal purchase recommendation for enduro racers.
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
The universal bike from Husky, it can do practically everything. And as something in between the 250 and 450, it combines the advantages of both models. It has also become somewhat stronger in 2017 and is now more comparable to the 450 in terms of responsiveness.
Usporedba cijena Prosječna tržišna cijena KTM 350 EXC-F vs Husqvarna FE 350
There are a few key differences between a KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and a Husqvarna FE 350 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FE 350 with 44 days compared to 76 days for the KTM 350 EXC-F. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the KTM 350 EXC-F and 9 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 350 EXC-F was published on 11/2/2010 and now has more than 10,800 views. This compares to more than 91,700 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 350 published on 7/14/2016.
