Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016
The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have some key differences in terms of specifications and strengths.
Starting with the engine, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is equipped with an in-line, 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847cc. It produces a powerful 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a smaller in-line, 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 689cc. It generates 75 horsepower and 68 Nm of torque. Therefore, the MT-09 has a more powerful and torquey engine compared to the MT-07.
In terms of cooling, both bikes have liquid-cooled engines, ensuring optimal performance and temperature regulation. This is important for maintaining engine longevity and preventing overheating during long rides.
Moving on to the suspension, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the MT-07 2016 has a telescopic fork. The upside-down fork on the MT-09 provides better stability and improved handling, especially during aggressive riding. However, the telescopic fork on the MT-07 is still capable of delivering a comfortable and smooth ride.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
When it comes to the chassis, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has an aluminum frame, which offers a good balance between rigidity and weight. On the other hand, the MT-07 2016 has a steel frame, which may be slightly heavier but provides a solid and stable platform for the bike.
In terms of brakes, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power. This is important for safety, especially during high-speed riding or emergency situations.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the 1400mm wheelbase of the MT-07 2016. This contributes to better stability and handling at higher speeds for the MT-09. The seat height of the MT-09 is also slightly higher at 815mm compared to the 805mm seat height of the MT-07. However, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters, as well as fuel tank capacities.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 has several strengths, including the addition of Öhlins suspension, which greatly enhances the bike's performance. The Akrapovic exhaust system not only improves the bike's sound but also adds to its overall aesthetics. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump provides excellent braking performance. The Carbon2Race covers offer a visually appealing look. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is highly effective in providing a comfortable riding position.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has its own set of strengths. It has a very agile engine, making it easy to handle and maneuver. The bike's low weight contributes to its nimble nature. The aggressively angular look gives it a sporty and eye-catching appearance. The powerful brakes ensure reliable stopping power. The comfortable seating position allows for long rides without discomfort. The throaty sound adds to the overall riding experience. The extensive and easy-to-read display provides all the necessary information at a glance.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 requires a higher financial outlay and more working time due to the addition of certain parts that need to be registered. The ECU Flash is not road legal, which may limit its use in certain situations. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly soft chassis, and the footrests may start to drag during aggressive cornering. Some plastic parts on the bike may feel cheap, and the telescopic fork can be considered boring by some riders.
In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both excellent naked bikes from Yamaha, each with its own set of strengths and weaknesses. The MT-09 offers a more powerful engine, improved suspension, and a higher level of customization options. On the other hand, the MT-07 provides a nimble and agile riding experience, with a comfortable seating position and an aggressive look. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Riding fast is possible, but exhausting. The high handlebars are counterproductive on the race track and require a lot of physical effort. The MT-09 can't keep up with the Street Triple R, even with WP suspension.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Even after three years, the Yamaha MT-07 is still a public favourite. No one else beats such a price-performance ratio. The two-cylinder engine is powerful, but can be dosed very gently at low revs. The display is also one of the best in this class, with good readability. Only the chassis is disappointing. In a sporty riding style, it is simply too soft, which can cause the MT-07 to sway.
Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2017 is about 36% higher. A Yamaha MT-09 2017 experiences a loss of 810 USD in one year and 1,050 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 710 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 73 days for the Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
