Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

The Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 are both powerful naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine, the Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 is equipped with a 1043cc inline-four engine that produces 142 horsepower and 111 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 features a slightly smaller 999cc inline-four engine that delivers 149 horsepower and 106 Nm of torque. Both engines are fuel-injected and liquid-cooled, providing efficient and reliable performance.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock in the rear. The Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 offers adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for both the front and rear suspension, allowing riders to fine-tune their riding experience. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015, on the other hand, only offers adjustable preload and rebound settings for the rear suspension.

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

When it comes to the chassis, both bikes have aluminum frames, providing a lightweight and rigid structure. However, the Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 features a double cradle frame, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has a twin tube frame. Both frames offer stability and precise handling, but the double cradle frame of the Kawasaki may provide slightly better overall performance.

In terms of braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes in the front with a diameter of 310mm and four-piston calipers. The Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 features radial, monoblock, petal technology for its front brakes, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 uses radial technology. Both bikes offer strong and reliable braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have front and rear tires with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tires have a width of 190mm. The Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015's 1460mm. Both bikes have a seat height of 815mm and a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 is praised for its powerful engine and high-quality chassis, providing a stable and precise riding experience. It offers a true naked bike feeling without the hecticness of a supersport bike. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 is known for its legendary Suzuki engine, sharp sound, and harmonious tuning. It also features strong brakes and a taut chassis.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 has a limited steering angle, which may affect maneuverability in certain situations. It also lacks a shift assistant, which can be a disadvantage for riders who prefer quick and smooth gear changes. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 is based on an older design, which may result in weaker performance in the higher rev range. It is also noted for its load change characteristics.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki offers a powerful engine and high-quality chassis, while the Suzuki features a legendary engine and pleasing design. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017
Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore77 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power142 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,300 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore38 mmThrottle Bore44 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,043 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel131 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, Monoblock, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,045 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth790 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,055 mmHeight1,080 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Of course, on paper the Z1000R is inferior to current Powernakeds and in a classic points evaluation it also loses to the simply perfect Z900. BUT it still exudes pure fascination. Not everyone will like it, but some will adore it. A truly masculine man's bike with a very superior engine and a chassis from the golden era of naked bikes. The Z1000R is still a true naked bike from Supersport Gene - with all its advantages and disadvantages.

Powerful and powerful naked bike engine. Nothing here seems contrived or high-bred - pure power

high-quality and superior chassis - stable, precise and full. Not a handling rocket - Nevertheless, this is among the advantages. Real nakedbike feeling without supersport hecticness

Little steering angle

shift assistant missing

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

The GSX-S1000 is an honest motorbike in terms of performance and handling. You get even more than stated on paper, but you have to get the four-in-line up to speed first. As a rider, you have the feeling that you are still in command, even if the GSX-S is no longer completely without standard riding assistance systems - which work extremely well. Contact with the road feels direct, the dynamics are precise and transparent. Not only in terms of design can this naked bike give pleasure for many years to come, the somewhat outdated basis is quickly forgotten.

Legendary Suzuki engine

sharp sound

rev-happy

harmonious tuning

pleasing design

strong brakes

taut chassis

no performance cheating.

Old base

weak performance in the rev range

load change

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z1000 R vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 is about 109% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 there are less Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 86 days compared to 173 days for the Kawasaki Z1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 R and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the Kawasaki Z1000 R was published on 6/2/2017 and now has more than 46,400 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 9/27/2014.

Price Kawasaki Z1000 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGSchuberthContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbH