Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and suspension setups. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has a higher output with 149 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020's 123 HP. This gives the Suzuki an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Additionally, the Suzuki has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Triumph's 79 Nm, which contributes to its strong performance.

Both bikes feature fuel injection systems and have liquid cooling to ensure optimal engine temperature. The Suzuki has a larger displacement of 999 ccm compared to the Triumph's 765 ccm, which may contribute to its higher power output.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm setups at the rear. The suspension on both models can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. This allows riders to fine-tune the suspension to their preferences and riding style.

Both bikes have aluminum frames with twin tube designs, which provide stability and agility. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 310 mm and four pistons, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 has the same setup but with the addition of radial and monoblock technology. This gives the Triumph superior braking performance and control.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes come with ABS as standard. However, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 offers additional features such as riding modes, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. These features enhance the bike's performance and safety, giving riders more control and customization options.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has a slightly wider rear tire at 190 mm compared to the Triumph's 180 mm. The Suzuki also has a longer wheelbase at 1460 mm compared to the Triumph's 1405 mm. However, the Triumph has a slightly higher seat height at 825 mm compared to the Suzuki's 815 mm. In terms of weight, the Triumph is lighter with a kerb weight of 187 kg compared to the Suzuki's 209 kg.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 is criticized for its old base and weak performance in the rev range, as well as load change issues. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 has some complaints about its somewhat complicated menu navigation, bugged connectivity system, and poorly accessible adjustment screws on the fork.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a legendary engine, strong brakes, and a taut chassis, while the Triumph boasts a lively engine, high-quality standard features, and a sporty look. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power123 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,750 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque79 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,350 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12.54
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel131 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth795 mmWidth775 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)187 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

The GSX-S1000 is an honest motorbike in terms of performance and handling. You get even more than stated on paper, but you have to get the four-in-line up to speed first. As a rider, you have the feeling that you are still in command, even if the GSX-S is no longer completely without standard riding assistance systems - which work extremely well. Contact with the road feels direct, the dynamics are precise and transparent. Not only in terms of design can this naked bike give pleasure for many years to come, the somewhat outdated basis is quickly forgotten.

Legendary Suzuki engine

sharp sound

rev-happy

harmonious tuning

pleasing design

strong brakes

taut chassis

no performance cheating.

Old base

weak performance in the rev range

load change

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020

As before, the RS top model is indeed the most desirable of the Street Triples. In addition to the usual playful handling, the super-direct Brembo brakes and the lively character of the three-cylinder engine, there is now a more bulbous mid-range, upgraded electronics as well as a Brembo M50 brake and the once again sharpened appearance. Thanks to the very sporty Pirelli Supercorsa SP V3 tyres, trackdays are indeed a serious issue, and the now standard shift assistant with blipper function greatly increases the incentive to switch to the new model. A wonderful fun machine for both country road and track!

Fantastically lively engine

high quality standard

quickshifter with blipper as standard

roaring sound

excellent Brembo M50 brake system

ABS and traction control as standard

sporty look

low weight.

somewhat complicated menu navigation

connectivity system bugged

adjustment screws on the fork poorly accessible

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 is about 37% higher. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2020 there are more Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 86 days compared to 91 days for a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH