Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 300 2015 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionKokusanIgnitionKokusan
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293.2 ccmDisplacement293.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104.6 kgDry Weight104.6 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

The racing machine for two-stroke enthusiasts. Perfectly tuned and fast as an arrow. A bestseller in the Husvqarna range! And rightly so! In the test, we also tried it in combination with a Rekluse clutch. But the overall package seemed a little too nervous. The TE300 is best enjoyed with a conventional clutch.

Lightweight, powerful, extremely fast

engine easy to control

lots of traction in the lower rev range, power for every situation in the upper rev range

inexpensive to run, hardly any service costs

reliable! The huge engine runs 95% of the time at partial load anyway.

More nervous and strenuous on connecting stages than a four-stroke

lower range than with four-stroke

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!

Much quieter due to balancer shaft

powerful engine

best balance of weight and performance

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna TE 300

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH