Triumph Sprint ST 2010 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Sprint ST 2010 compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Triumph Sprint ST 2010
Kawasaki Z 750 2013
Triumph Sprint ST 2010
Triumph Sprint ST 2010
Kawasaki Z 750 2013
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore68.4 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power126 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque105 NmTorque78 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement748 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,114 mmLength2,085 mm
WidthWidth750 mmWidth805 mm
HeightHeight1,215 mmHeight1,100 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,457 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity18.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Kawasaki Z 750 2013

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Sprint ST vs Kawasaki Z 750

Price Triumph Sprint ST

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Kawasaki Z 750 2010
VS.
Suzuki GSR 750 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2010 vs
Suzuki GSR 750 2012

Kawasaki Z1000 2008
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z1000 2008 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z 750 2013
VS.
Suzuki GSX-S 750 2021

Kawasaki Z 750 2013 vs
Suzuki GSX-S 750 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2010 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Triumph Sprint ST 2006
VS.
Triumph Speed Triple RS 2020

Triumph Sprint ST 2006 vs
Triumph Speed Triple RS 2020

Suzuki GSR 750 2014
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Suzuki GSR 750 2014 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Kawasaki Z 750 2013
VS.
Kawasaki Z 800 e 2014

Kawasaki Z 750 2013 vs
Kawasaki Z 800 e 2014

Suzuki GSR 600 2013
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Suzuki GSR 600 2013 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2005
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z1000 2005 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Honda VFR 800 F 2005
VS.
Triumph Sprint ST 2008

Honda VFR 800 F 2005 vs
Triumph Sprint ST 2008

Kawasaki Z 750 2013
VS.
Yamaha MT-07 2018

Kawasaki Z 750 2013 vs
Yamaha MT-07 2018

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
VS.
Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs
Kawasaki Z 750 2011