Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2011 vs. Yamaha Aerox 4 2020

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2011

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2011

Yamaha Aerox 4 2020

Yamaha Aerox 4 2020

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2011 compared to Yamaha Aerox 4 2020

Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2011
Yamaha Aerox 4 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore67 mmBore38 mm
StrokeStroke42.5 mmStroke43.2 mm
Engine powerEngine power102 HPEngine power3.45 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque3.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeCentrifugal force
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionCDI
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
LengthLength2,085 mmLength1,876 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth705 mm
HeightHeight1,090 mmHeight1,154 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,275 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height817 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight198 kgKerb Weight97 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity6 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyAM

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CB 600 F Hornet vs Yamaha Aerox 4

Price Honda CB 600 F Hornet

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha Aerox 4

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons