Beta Alp 200 2022 vs. Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Beta Alp 200 2022

Beta Alp 200 2022

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta Alp 200 2022 compared to Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Beta Alp 200 2022
Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke58.2 mmStroke54 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.4 Compression Ratio10
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement199 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,107 mmHeight1,200 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,355 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height890 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight108 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity6 lFuel Tank Capacity5.7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Alp 200 vs Beta RE 125 4T

Price Beta Alp 200

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta RE 125 4T

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH