Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2018

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2018

Yamaha MT-09 2018

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs Yamaha MT-09 2018

The Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and the Yamaha MT-09 2018 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and suspension setups. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2018 has a slight advantage with 115 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021's 95 HP. This means that the Yamaha may offer a more exhilarating and powerful riding experience, especially when ridden briskly. However, the Suzuki's engine still provides plenty of punch from below and has a good sound.

When it comes to torque, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has the upper hand with 92 Nm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2018's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Suzuki may offer better low-end grunt and acceleration.

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. However, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021's chassis is criticized for being too soft and not adjustable, which may affect the bike's handling and stability. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2018 is praised for its lively handling and smooth wheels, offering a more agile and responsive ride.

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and a swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. This setup provides good overall suspension performance and comfort for both models.

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes at the front. However, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has larger diameter disks (310 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2018 (298 mm), which may result in slightly better braking performance for the Suzuki.

Both bikes also come equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. Additionally, the Yamaha MT-09 2018 has the added benefit of a quickshifter, allowing for seamless and quick gear changes.

Yamaha MT-09 2018

Yamaha MT-09 2018

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has a slightly larger wheelbase (1460 mm) compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2018 (1440 mm). However, the Yamaha has a slightly higher seat height (815 mm) compared to the Suzuki (810 mm). Additionally, the Suzuki has a larger fuel tank capacity (19 l) compared to the Yamaha (14 l), which may result in longer riding range.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 is criticized for its soft and non-adjustable chassis, which may affect the bike's handling and precision. Additionally, the cockpit of the Suzuki is not easy to read in sunlight, which may be inconvenient for riders.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2018 is criticized for being exhausting when ridden briskly, requiring more riding skills overall compared to other naked bikes in the mid-range. Additionally, some riders feel that the Yamaha lacks precision and has a less than ideal feeling for traction on the rear wheel.

In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and the Yamaha MT-09 2018 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a comfortable seating position, good sound, stable brakes, and an engine with plenty of punch from below. On the other hand, the Yamaha offers a visually appealing design, lively handling, and an incredibly powerful engine. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2018

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021
Yamaha MT-09 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,800 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth810 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)214 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

The "small" GSX-S950 is damn close to the GSX-S1000, which is why it seems as if the proud surcharge for the 1000 will have to be properly justified. However, anyone who wants it to be as sporty as on the GSX-S1000 will already fail due to the somewhat too soft, non-adjustable suspension. However, this more comfortable design of the 950 fits the character of the engine very well. With (only) 95 hp, the engine, which is identical to the GSX-S1000, is designed for torque from below and in the middle; there is little point in stubbornly wriggling out. So if you are looking for a comparatively comfortable naked bike that is suitable for A2 and that can hardly be distinguished visually from the top model, you can save a lot of money!

Engine with plenty of punch from below

good sound

stable brakes

comfortable seating position

Chassis too soft and not adjustable

cockpit not easy to read in sunlight

Yamaha MT-09 2018

Yamaha MT-09 2018

A coherent motorbike where everything fits together. The motorbike delivers what its looks promise. High-tech, charisma and lots of adrenaline. It is a mixture of supermoto, naked bike and streetfighter and it loves to be handled irrationally. A cool motorbike. Only in comparison with the MT-09 SP does one begin to miss a high-quality chassis.

Optics and character harmonise perfectly

wheels smoothly

lively handling

comfortable seating position even for tall riders

engine feels incredibly powerful

Exhausting when ridden briskly

bike requires more riding skills overall than other naked bikes in the mid-range

feeling for traction on the rear wheel not so great

lack of precision.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S950 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and a Yamaha MT-09 2018. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 72 days compared to 298 days for the Suzuki GSX-S950. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S950 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S950 was published on 6/16/2021 and now has more than 37,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Suzuki GSX-S950

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH