Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with 115 HP of power and 87.5 Nm of torque. They also have the same number of cylinders and displacement.

In terms of suspension, the XSR900 has an Upside-Down telescopic fork on the front, while the MT-09 has a telescopic fork. Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. They also have double disk brakes on the front.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter, as well as the same wheelbase, seat height, and fuel tank capacity. They also have the same kerb weight, but the XSR900 is slightly heavier when equipped with ABS.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths of each bike. The XSR900 has a greedy engine that delivers powerful performance. It also has well-tuned riding modes, ABS, and TC as standard features. The bike's authentic modern design and clean workmanship are also notable strengths.

On the other hand, the MT-09 has a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant. It offers three power modes and has a fully adjustable chassis, allowing riders to customize their riding experience. The bike also comes with a quickshifter as standard and has a sporty upright seating position. The MT-09's good brakes and aggressive looks are also worth mentioning, as well as its traction control feature.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The XSR900 has a hard chassis, which may result in a less comfortable ride. The seat could also be more comfortable for long tours. Additionally, the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already present on many other Yamaha models, which may make it less unique.

As for the MT-09, its saddle is also considered a little too hard for long tours. The license plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one, which could be a disadvantage in wet conditions.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The XSR900 excels in terms of its engine performance, riding modes, and design, while the MT-09 stands out with its powerful three-cylinder engine, adjustable chassis, and sporty seating position. However, riders should consider the potential drawbacks of each bike, such as the XSR900's hard chassis and the MT-09's less protective license plate holder.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 13% higher. A Yamaha XSR900 2016 experiences a loss of 1,650 USD in one year and 1,670 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 420 USD and 720 USD for a Yamaha MT-09 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH