Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 2009
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandPaioliBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandPaioliBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,470 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113 kgDry Weight96 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH