BMW R 1200 RS 2015 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 RS 2015 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW R 1200 RS 2015 is equipped with a Boxer engine that delivers 125 horsepower and 125 Nm of torque. It has a 4-stroke transmission with 2 cylinders and a displacement of 1170 ccm. The transmission is a prop shaft, which provides smooth power delivery. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 features an in-line engine that produces 152 horsepower and 106 Nm of torque. It has a 4-stroke transmission with 4 cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm. The transmission is a chain, which may require more maintenance compared to a prop shaft.

In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 RS 2015 has a telescopic fork front suspension and a paralever rear suspension. This combination provides a comfortable and stable ride. The chassis is made of steel and has a load-bearing engine frame type. The front brakes are double disk with radial technology. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1530 mm and the seat height is 820 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 236 kg and the fuel tank capacity is 18 liters.

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension. This combination also provides a stable and comfortable ride. The chassis is made of aluminium and has a twin tube frame type. The front brakes are double disk with radial, monoblock technology. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1460 mm and the seat height is 810 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 226 kg and the fuel tank capacity is 19 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1200 RS 2015 is praised for its agile and high-revving boxer engine, which provides a cool and muffled sound. It also has a good, adjustable windshield and a comfortable seating position suitable for touring. The chassis is stable and it comes with ABS and traction control as standard. Additionally, it offers selectable riding modes and has a front-end look inspired by the S 1000 RR superbike. It also has an extensive list of accessories available.

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 is praised for its awesome engine that delivers lots of torque from the middle. The chassis is also stable and it offers versatile ergonomics, making it suitable for various riding styles. It has a good sound and a top quickshifter. Furthermore, it offers a good price-performance ratio, making it an attractive option for riders looking for value.

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1200 RS 2015 has a poorly readable speedometer and rev counter, which can be inconvenient for some riders. Additionally, many features are available at an extra cost, which can increase the overall price of the motorcycle.

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 has a rather long gear ratio, which may not be ideal for riders who prefer quick acceleration. The windshield is not adjustable, which may limit customization options for some riders. It also lacks a lean angle sensor, which can be a disadvantage for riders who prioritize advanced safety features.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 RS 2015 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

BMW R 1200 RS 2015
Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power152 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque125 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionParaleverSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,203 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth998 mmWidth825 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,530 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)236 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)226 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

BMW R 1200 RS 2015

Wunderlich has optimised the already great R 1200 RS with pinpoint accuracy and turned it into a real dream machine. The straight handlebars fit the sports tourer really well. The bike's sporty look is justified. Anyone who tries this Wunderlich machine sets the bar incredibly high for their next motorbike. A real dream bike.

Precise and stable handling

comfortable seating position

great wind protection

with the Wunderlich conversion, a very sporty and sleek look overall.

Knee angle somewhat compact with long legs

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022

The Grand Touring variant of the GSX-S combines the supersport genes of the model series with an amazing amount of touring potential. The top chassis and the bombastic engine guarantee riding pleasure. At the same time, the ergonomics are versatile enough to make relaxed stages possible. As a genuine sports tourer, the Suzuki takes both sport and touring seriously and manages this compromise extremely well. Only the gear ratio could be a little shorter for country road use and technocrats might miss lean angle-dependent systems. Apart from that, however, the GSX-S GT offers lavish features and a well-rounded overall package.

Awesome engine with lots of torque from the centre

Stable chassis

Versatile ergonomics

Good sound

Top quickshifter

Good price-performance ratio

Rather long gear ratio

windscreen not adjustable

no lean angle sensor

shock could do with more damping

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW R 1200 RS vs Suzuki GSX-S1000GT

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 RS 2015 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 is about 8% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000GT 2022 there are less BMW R 1200 RS 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 46. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 RS with 78 days compared to 136 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000GT. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 13 reviews for the BMW R 1200 RS and 13 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000GT since model year 2022. The first review for the BMW R 1200 RS was published on 9/30/2014 and now has more than 28,300 views. This compares to more than 76,300 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000GT published on 9/22/2021.

Price BMW R 1200 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons