Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2013 compared to SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 125 2013
SWM SM 125 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke47.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.8 Compression Ratio12.8
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height914 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH