Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna TE 125 2013
Husqvarna TE 125 2013
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight92 kgDry Weight96 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGSchuberthContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbH