Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Triumph Trident 660 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Triumph Trident 660 2021

Triumph Trident 660 2021

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Triumph Trident 660 2021

In terms of technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and Triumph Trident 660 2021 share several similarities. Both bikes have an in-line engine with a displacement of around 660cc. They also have liquid cooling systems and utilize fuel injection for their fuel systems. Additionally, both bikes feature a swing arm suspension with a monoshock absorber at the rear and an upside-down telescopic fork at the front.

However, there are notable differences between the two models. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 boasts a more powerful engine with 115 horsepower, compared to the Triumph Trident 660 2021's 81 horsepower. The MT-09 also has a higher torque output of 87.5 Nm, while the Trident 660 offers 64 Nm of torque.

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Triumph Trident 660 2021 utilizes a steel frame with a perimeter design. The choice of materials and frame design can impact the bike's overall weight and handling characteristics.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Both bikes come equipped with double disc brakes at the front, but the Triumph Trident 660 2021 has slightly larger brake discs with a diameter of 310mm, compared to the MT-09's 298mm discs. Both models also offer advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, but the Triumph Trident 660 2021 goes a step further by offering riding modes as well.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm, compared to the Trident 660's 1401mm wheelbase. The seat height of the MT-09 is also slightly higher at 815mm, while the Trident 660 offers a seat height of 805mm. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

When it comes to strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 stands out with its Öhlins suspension, which provides excellent performance. The addition of an Akrapovic exhaust system enhances the bike's aesthetics and sound. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump offers exceptional braking performance, and the Carbon2Race covers add to the bike's overall appearance. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is also praised for its effectiveness.

On the other hand, the Triumph Trident 660 2021 impresses with its powerful three-cylinder engine, which delivers a satisfying performance. The bike's chassis and brakes are surprisingly good for its class, providing a confident and enjoyable riding experience. The extensive electronic equipment, including riding modes and traction control, adds to the bike's appeal. Additionally, the optional quickshifter with blipper and simple, accessible controls make for a user-friendly experience.

Triumph Trident 660 2021

Triumph Trident 660 2021

In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is noted for its financial outlay and the need for a significant amount of working time. Certain parts may also require registration, and the ECU flash is not road legal.

On the other hand, the Triumph Trident 660 2021 is criticized for its overly defensive traction control, which may limit the bike's performance in certain situations.

Overall, both the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and Triumph Trident 660 2021 have their strengths and weaknesses. The MT-09 offers a more powerful engine and a range of aftermarket enhancements, while the Trident 660 impresses with its performance, electronic features, and user-friendly controls. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Triumph Trident 660 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2017
Triumph Trident 660 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke51.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power81 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,250 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.95
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement660 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typePerimeter
RakeRake65 degreeRake24.6 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail107.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter255 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth815 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,089 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,401 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2, A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Triumph Trident 660 2021

Triumph Trident 660 2021

You can tell that the Trident is a new bike. Triumph has developed the necessary ingredients for the year 2021 with pinpoint accuracy. Cheeky but not intrusive sound, a lively engine and a comprehensive electronics package including quickshifter are simply fun. A casual motorbike that even experienced riders can have a lot of fun riding.

Powerful three-cylinder powerplant

surprisingly good chassis and brakes for this class

extensive electronic equipment

optional quickshifter with blipper

simple and accessible controls

Traction control overall very defensive

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Trident 660

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Triumph Trident 660 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2017 is about 8% higher. Compared to Triumph Trident 660 2021 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 23. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 85 days for a Triumph Trident 660. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 20 reviews for the Triumph Trident 660 since model year 2021. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 76,700 views for the first review on Triumph Trident 660 published on 10/30/2020.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Trident 660

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH