Honda CB650F 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Honda CB650F 2016

Honda CB650F 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - Honda CB650F 2016 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of engine specifications, the Honda CB650F 2016 is equipped with an in-line four-cylinder engine that produces 87 horsepower and 63 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 features an in-line three-cylinder engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. This gives the Yamaha MT-09 a significant advantage in terms of power output.

Both bikes have a similar chassis setup, with the Honda CB650F featuring a steel frame and the Yamaha MT-09 equipped with an aluminum frame. The use of aluminum in the frame of the Yamaha MT-09 helps to reduce the overall weight of the bike, making it lighter than the Honda CB650F. The Yamaha MT-09 weighs 188 kg, while the Honda CB650F weighs 200 kg.

In terms of braking performance, both bikes have double disc brakes at the front. This ensures excellent stopping power and control for both models.

Honda CB650F 2016

Honda CB650F 2016

When it comes to tire specifications, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width of 120 mm and diameter of 17 inches. This provides good stability and grip on the road for both models.

In terms of dimensions, the Honda CB650F has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 1440 mm. However, the difference is minimal and is unlikely to have a significant impact on the handling and maneuverability of the bikes.

The seat height of the Honda CB650F is 810 mm, while the Yamaha MT-09 has a slightly higher seat height of 815 mm. This may be a consideration for riders with shorter legs, as the higher seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 may make it slightly more difficult to reach the ground.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Honda CB650F has a larger tank with a capacity of 17.3 liters, while the Yamaha MT-09 has a smaller tank with a capacity of 14 liters. This means that the Honda CB650F may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Turning to the strengths of each bike, the Honda CB650F is praised for its comfort, easy handling, well-functioning components, and generous service intervals of 12,000 km. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 is commended for its wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, three power modes, fully adjustable chassis, quickshifter as standard, sporty upright seating position, good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control.

However, the Honda CB650F does have some weaknesses, including vibrations between 5 and 7 thousand revolutions, a long gear ratio, and a sticker instead of paintwork. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 has a few weaknesses, such as a saddle that may be a little too hard for long tours and a license plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one.

In conclusion, while both the Honda CB650F 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are capable naked bikes, the Yamaha MT-09 offers a more powerful engine, lighter weight, and additional features such as power modes and a quickshifter. However, the Honda CB650F excels in terms of comfort, easy handling, and longer service intervals. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Honda CB650F 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

Honda CB650F 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke46 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power87 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque63 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.4 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth775 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight200 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.3 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CB650F 2016

Honda CB650F 2016

Proven Honda quality for beginners and all those looking for a comfortable, uncomplicated naked bike with a lively look.

Comfort

easy handling

well-functioning components

generous service intervals of 12,000 km

Vibrations between 5 and 7 thousand revolutions

long gear ratio

sticker instead of paintwork

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CB650F vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Honda CB650F 2016 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 20% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are less Honda CB650F 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB650F with 79 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the Honda CB650F and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Honda CB650F was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 14,100 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Honda CB650F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH