Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025 vs. Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025 compared to Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025
Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore84 mmBore83.5 mm
StrokeStroke81.5 mmStroke67.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power40 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpm
TorqueTorque40 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque5,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio9.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement451.65 ccmDisplacement743 ccm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by WireAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Tire pressure monitoring system, Cruise control, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,285 mmLength2,185 mm
WidthWidth852 mmWidth840 mm
HeightHeight1,316 mmHeight1,450 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,522 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Seat Height up toSeat Height up to845 mmSeat Height up to815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.8 l
Ground clearanceGround clearance230 mmGround clearance205 mm

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentConnectivity, LED-Headlights, TFT display, USB-C socket, Integrated navigation systemEquipmentBluetooth, Connectivity, LED-Headlights, TFT display, USB-C socket, Integrated navigation system, Automatic turn signal reset, Multiple USB ports

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2025

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 452 is a bike with a unique character that impresses with its accessibility and reliability. It is ideal for riders who are looking for an uncomplicated, yet powerful enduro bike that can cope with different types of terrain. Although it is not the most powerful or sporty bike, it impresses with its easy handling, robust construction and reliable electronics. Its suspension is stable at speed, but quickly reaches its limits. Overall, the Himalayan offers a pleasant riding experience for adventurers looking for a robust and good-natured machine.

Easy handling and accessible riding style

Robust and reliable suspension

Compact dimensions and low seat height make it accessible

Good travelling qualities as a comfortable companion

Not particularly powerful or sporty

suspension quickly reaches its limits under intensive use

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Royal Enfield Himalayan 750 2027

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 750

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 750

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons