Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026 vs. Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026

Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026 compared to Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026
Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line crankpin offset
BoreBore78 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke53.4 mmStroke63.93 mm
Engine powerEngine power130 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,400 rpm
TorqueTorque80 NmTorque70 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.25 Compression Ratio13.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch systemsClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch systems
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement765 ccmDisplacement659 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandÖhlins
TravelTravel115 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
BrandBrandÖhlinsBrandÖhlins
TravelTravel131.2 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeLoad-bearing engine
RakeRake23 degreeRake65.9 degree
TrailTrail95.3 mmTrail104.6 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Modern electronics, Cornering traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie, Modern electronics

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,051 mmLength1,995 mm
WidthWidth765 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,051 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,397 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height839 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)188 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)183 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange288 kmRange312 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions119 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions110 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption5.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption4.8 l/100km
Euro NormEuro NormEuro 5+Euro NormEuro 5+

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display, Modern electronics, LightingEquipmentLED-Headlights, Lighting

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026

Triumph Street Triple 765 RX 2026

The new Triumph Street Triple RX is uncompromisingly aimed at sport-oriented riders. With its revvy 765-cubic centimetre engine, it offers great performance.three-cylinder engine, high-quality Öhlins suspension, snappy Brembo Stylema brakes and ergonomics consistently geared towards the front wheel, it brings more race track DNA to the open road than almost any other naked bike in its class. At the same time, however, it demands more commitment from its rider than the Trident 800. Anyone who enjoys revving the engine to the redline, riding precise lines and seeking maximum feedback will be thrilled by the RX. It is deliberately designed without compromise for everyday use, but that is precisely where its strength lies. As the new flagship model in the Street three cylinder range, the RX clearly prioritises riding dynamics and excitement, appealing to all those who want to get the most out of every kilometre, whether on country roads or, occasionally, on the race track.

Revvy, exhilarating three cylinder engine

Outstanding Öhlins suspension with full adjustability

Extremely precise and direct handling

Excellent feel for the front wheel

Top-of-the-range Brembo Stylema braking system

Maximum lean angle and sporty ergonomics

Lightweight and effortless steering response

Modern electronics including a quickshifter and cruise control

Ride dynamics and feedback of the highest standard

Sporty riding position and short handlebars make long journeys tiring

The engine requires frequent gear changes for maximum performance

High purchase price

Suspension is set up on the firm side for poor road conditions

Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Aprilia RS 660 Factory 2026

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RX vs Aprilia RS 660 Factory

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RX

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Aprilia RS 660 Factory

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons