Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs. KTM 690 SMC 2008

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

KTM 690 SMC 2008

KTM 690 SMC 2008

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs KTM 690 SMC 2008

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

KTM 690 SMC 2008

KTM 690 SMC 2008

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2013 compared to KTM 690 SMC 2008

Husqvarna TE 310 2013
KTM 690 SMC 2008

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement654 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,472 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height900 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight139.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

The Italian with new Bavarian roots is brand new in the business. The missing link between the E1 and E2 class. And that is exactly the performance that will make masses of hobby riders happy. KTM has already shown the way with the 400, and now others are following suit.

Optimal chassis and manoeuvrability

plenty of engine power

warranty.

clumsy ignition lock/switch

high weight

clutch with weaknesses

KTM 690 SMC 2008

KTM 690 SMC 2008

Actually, everything fits except for the looks. This is where KTM now pulls the lever and delivers an impeccable overall concept - plus, of course, better riding performance.

Fully-fledged supermoto

relatively low weight

very suitable for off-road use

sporty look

good handling.

Suboptimal wind protection

comfort somewhat low

loud background noise from airbox.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Husqvarna TE 310 vs KTM 690 SMC

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 690 SMC

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons