Beta RR 350 4T 2014 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Beta RR 350 4T 2014 vs SWM RS 300 R 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Technical Specifications Beta RR 350 4T 2014 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2014
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Beta RR 350 4T 2014
Beta RR 350 4T 2014
SWM RS 300 R 2016
SWM RS 300 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke57.4 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionCDI, KokusanIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement349.1 ccmDisplacement298 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height940 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113 kgDry Weight107 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

Beta RR 350 4T 2014

We liked the Beta RR 350 very much and were surprised above all by the great engine tuning. Often a problem with the smaller manufacturers. Weight, handling and chassis quality were also convincing. In the intensive test on Cyprus, the Beta got full points. The equipment could be improved a little. Hand protectors, for example, would look good on the standard Beta.

Cleanly controllable engine

wide rev range

sporty seating position

good feeling for traction

inexpensive spare parts

pleasant handling.

Still difficult to sell on the second-hand market

plastics do not appear as high-quality as the rest of the bike

equipment not 100% race-ready.

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 350 4T vs SWM RS 300 R

Price Beta RR 350 4T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 300 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

Sherco 300 SEF Factory 2022
VS.
Beta RR 350 4T 2021

Sherco 300 SEF Factory 2022 vs
Beta RR 350 4T 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2024
VS.
Beta Alp 4.0 2024

Beta RR 350 4T 2024 vs
Beta Alp 4.0 2024

Beta RR 350 4T 2022
VS.
Beta RR 50 Enduro 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2022 vs
Beta RR 50 Enduro 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2021
VS.
Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2021 vs
Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2022
VS.
KTM 350 EXC-F 2020

Beta RR 350 4T 2022 vs
KTM 350 EXC-F 2020

Beta RR 350 4T 2022
VS.
Beta RR 350 4T Racing 2022

Beta RR 350 4T 2022 vs
Beta RR 350 4T Racing 2022

Zündapp ZXE 250 2020
VS.
Beta RR 350 4T 2022

Zündapp ZXE 250 2020 vs
Beta RR 350 4T 2022

SWM RS 300 R 2022
VS.
SWM SM 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM SM 500 R 2020

Beta RR 350 4T 2021
VS.
Husqvarna FE 350 2021

Beta RR 350 4T 2021 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2021

SWM RS 300 R 2022
VS.
SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2016
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs
Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2017
VS.
Beta RR 350 4T Racing 2022

Beta RR 350 4T 2017 vs
Beta RR 350 4T Racing 2022

SWM RS 300 R 2017
VS.
SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2017 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2020