BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs BMW K 1300 R 2009

The BMW F 800 R and the BMW K 1300 R, both released in 2009, are naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are significant differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW F 800 R has 87 HP, while the BMW K 1300 R boasts a much higher power of 173 HP. This means that the K 1300 R provides a more thrilling and powerful riding experience compared to the F 800 R.

The torque of the F 800 R is 86 Nm, while the K 1300 R has a torque of 140 Nm. Again, the K 1300 R offers a significantly higher torque, providing better acceleration and overall performance.

In terms of displacement, the F 800 R has a smaller engine with a displacement of 798 ccm, while the K 1300 R has a larger engine with a displacement of 1293 ccm. This larger displacement contributes to the K 1300 R's higher power and torque.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front, ensuring reliable and efficient braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are slight differences between the two models. The wheelbase of the F 800 R is 1520 mm, while the K 1300 R has a longer wheelbase of 1585 mm. This longer wheelbase may result in better stability and handling for the K 1300 R.

Both bikes have a seat height of 820 mm, providing a comfortable riding position for most riders. The dry weight of the F 800 R is 177 kg, while the K 1300 R is slightly heavier at 217 kg. This weight difference may affect the agility and maneuverability of the bikes.

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 19 liters, ensuring a decent range for long rides.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The F 800 R is praised for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and the possibility of adding good equipment. It also has a well-designed cockpit, a positive chassis, and low fuel consumption. However, some reviewers note that the F 800 R has a high price, and the first gear is a little too long. Additionally, some riders may find the aesthetics of the F 800 R to be less appealing.

On the other hand, the K 1300 R stands out for its sharp looks, impressive power output, and comfortable and relaxed riding experience. It comes with optimized systems such as ABS, RDC, EVO, ASC, and ESA 2, enhancing safety and convenience. However, some riders mention that the K 1300 R requires a curve settling-in period at the beginning, which may affect the initial handling.

In conclusion, the BMW F 800 R and BMW K 1300 R are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The F 800 R offers a good balance between performance and fuel efficiency, while the K 1300 R delivers a more powerful and exhilarating riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences, budget, and intended use of the bike.

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2009 compared to BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009
BMW K 1300 R 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW F 800 R 2009
BMW F 800 R 2009
BMW K 1300 R 2009
BMW K 1300 R 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore82 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke64.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power87 HPEngine power173 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque140 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,293 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

The throttle grip is pulled open, the K pushes forward and then, when you take a short break on other motorbikes, you simply stay fully on the throttle with the souped-up K and push in the next gear. A real gem for demanding races.

Sharp looks

plenty of power

comfort

relaxed ride

optimised system

ABS

RDC

EVO

ASC

ESA 2.

Curve settling-in period at the beginning.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs BMW K 1300 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a BMW K 1300 R 2009. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 800 R with 58 days compared to 81 days for a BMW K 1300 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 7 reviews for the BMW K 1300 R since model year 2009. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 20,400 views for the first review on BMW K 1300 R published on 10/9/2008.

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW K 1300 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AGSchuberth