Kawasaki Z 750 2010 vs. BMW F 900 XR 2022

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

BMW F 900 XR 2022

BMW F 900 XR 2022

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 750 2010 vs BMW F 900 XR 2022

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

BMW F 900 XR 2022

BMW F 900 XR 2022

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 750 2010 compared to BMW F 900 XR 2022

Kawasaki Z 750 2010
BMW F 900 XR 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore68.4 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque78 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,300 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio13.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement748 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth805 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)230 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

BMW F 900 XR 2022

BMW F 900 XR 2022

A bike in this performance class probably couldn't be more accessible. The XR waggles playfully through the bends and immediately inspires confidence in the saddle. Even lengthy touring is easy and you always get out of the saddle feeling relaxed. However, the sporty look of the BMW also awakens a desire for some thrills. However, the engine cannot quite fulfil this desire. The engine, transmission and quickshifter are a little too tame overall and could do with a little more sportiness.

Clean engine reponsiveness

very easy to ride

cool looks, great display

good brakes

easy handling

stable ride feel

great connectivity

maximum lean angle

well-tuned ABS

easy to manoeuvre

Hard seat

somewhat doughy transmission with tough quickshifter

engine could use more pepper

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 750 vs BMW F 900 XR

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH