Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026 vs. Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026 vs Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026 compared to Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026
Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke81.5 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power40 HPEngine power74 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque40 NmTorque70 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore42 mmThrottle Bore38 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping, Clutch systemsClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement451.65 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Modern electronicsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Traction control, Modern electronics, IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit), Cornering traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height830 mm
Dry Weight (with ABS)Dry Weight (with ABS)181 kgDry Weight (with ABS)172 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentConnectivity, LED-Headlights, TFT display, USB-C socket, Integrated navigation system, Modern electronics, Charging & power, LightingEquipmentBluetooth, Connectivity, LED-Headlights, TFT display, Modern electronics, Lighting, Storage space, Storage compartment, Windshield

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 2026

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 452 is a bike with a unique character that impresses with its accessibility and reliability. It is ideal for riders who are looking for an uncomplicated, yet powerful enduro bike that can cope with different types of terrain. Although it is not the most powerful or sporty bike, it impresses with its easy handling, robust construction and reliable electronics. Its suspension is stable at speed, but quickly reaches its limits. Overall, the Himalayan offers a pleasant riding experience for adventurers looking for a robust and good-natured machine.

Easy handling and accessible riding style

Robust and reliable suspension

Compact dimensions and low seat height make it accessible

Good travelling qualities as a comfortable companion

Not particularly powerful or sporty

suspension quickly reaches its limits under intensive use

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Fantic Caballero Travel 700 2026

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 vs Fantic Caballero Travel 700

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Fantic Caballero Travel 700

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons