Sherco 3.0 i 2013 vs. BMW F 800 ST 2009

Sherco 3.0 i 2013

Sherco 3.0 i 2013

BMW F 800 ST 2009

BMW F 800 ST 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Sherco 3.0 i 2013 compared to BMW F 800 ST 2009

Sherco 3.0 i 2013
BMW F 800 ST 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore84 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke75.6 mm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionBelt
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement290 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,480 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Sherco 3.0 i 2013

Sherco 3.0 i 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW F 800 ST 2009

BMW F 800 ST 2009

BMW wants to appeal to new target groups with the F 800 ST. In favour is an impeccable motorbike with many tasty details. Against it speaks the rather restrained design, the somewhat higher price compared to the competitors and the much too late market entry in the 2006 season.

Perfectly tuned engine

comfortable smoothness

sturdy single-sided swingarm

high-quality transmission

robust brakes

ABS.

Relatively unspectacular chassis without adjustment options.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Sherco 3.0 i vs BMW F 800 ST

Price Sherco 3.0 i

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price BMW F 800 ST

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons