SWM SM 125 R 2017 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Overview - SWM SM 125 R 2017 vs Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

Technical Specifications SWM SM 125 R 2017 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	58 mm	Bore	54 mm
Stroke	Stroke	47.2 mm	Stroke	54.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12.8	Compression Ratio	8.8
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Kick
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	124.7 ccm	Displacement	124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	110 mm	Front tyre width	110 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	150 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	70 %	Rear tyre height	60 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,485 mm	Wheelbase	1,470 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	913 mm	Seat Height	870 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	117 kg	Dry Weight	113.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.2 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Inexpensive 125cc with a very smart and sporty design.

Price

Optics

Brake

Chassis

Cold running behaviour: Tyres

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

Alternative Comparisons

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
KTM 125 Duke 2021

VS.

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013 vs
Beta RR 125 2T 2021

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2020 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2005 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009

VS.

SWM RS 125 R 2020 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

Husqvarna WRE 125 2013 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

SWM SM 500 R 2022 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2022

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
Beta RR Motard 125 4T LC 2022

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2018 vs
Beta RR 125 4T 2020

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2022 vs
Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2019

Ad

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

VS.

Beta RR 125 4T 2019

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
Beta RR 125 4T 2019