Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth740 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height800 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.

Taut, playful chassis

agile

low weight

powerful brake

comfort offered.

Brake application a little brute towards the end.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons